11 hours ago · As a result, a patient may become angry and threaten to sue. It is an all too familiar occurrence for those who work in the healthcare field. According to Physicians Practice’s 2013 Great American Physician Survey, 15% of physicians were threatened with legal action, and nearly 35% were named in a lawsuit. This means up to a staggering 50% of ... >> Go To The Portal
As a result, a patient may become angry and threaten to sue. It is an all too familiar occurrence for those who work in the healthcare field. According to Physicians Practice’s 2013 Great American Physician Survey, 15% of physicians were threatened with legal action, and nearly 35% were named in a lawsuit.
When a threat of a lawsuit is received, Greenfelder says the emergency physician should contact hospital risk management, and if he or she is a member of a group, the president of the group should be alerted. An ED nurse should contact his or her nursing supervisor, he advises.
When Doctors Sue Patients – Defamation Is Devastating, but a Lawsuit Could Make It Worse. In other words, suing for defamation might increase the damage caused by the post. This phenomenon is known as the Streisand effect. In 2003, Barbara Streisand attempted to suppress photographs of her residence appearing online.
Do not use terms such as “vicious, nasty, malicious,” in the medical record. A detailed report of the threat or complaint should be documented precisely as stated in the incident report. Do not write, “Patient dissatisfied and threatening to sue.” Instead write, “Patient expressing dissatisfaction with care and threatening to sue.
The injured patient must show that the physician acted negligently in rendering care, and that such negligence resulted in injury. To do so, four legal elements must be proven: (1) a professional duty owed to the patient; (2) breach of such duty; (3) injury caused by the breach; and (4) resulting damages.
An example of failure to give informed consent occurs when a doctor gives the patient a written consent form, but fails to explain the medical conditions or jargon the form refers to, or the risk of complication or death from a procedure.
1. Failure to diagnose a patient's medical condition. Some 31% of physicians surveyed by Medscape said this was the reason for a malpractice lawsuit brought against them, the publication said.
What is an Example of Lack of Informed Consent? The most common examples of a lack of informed consent includes a physician not letting a patient know the known risks associated with the procedure.
What type of situation would NOT meet the informed consent requirements? The patient signs a treatment consent form. If a licensed healthcare professional oversteps his or her scope of practice.
Medical coercive measures include mainly: measures restricting liberty, compulsory treatment, and involuntary committal/detention of persons admitted voluntarily.
Witman et al found that patients were significantly more likely to sue if the physician did not disclose an error (17). In another study, researchers found that patients' decision to sue was influenced not only by the original injury but also by insensitive handling and poor communication afterward (2).
In a negligence suit, the plaintiff has the burden of proving that the defendant did not act as a reasonable person would have acted under the circumstances. The court will instruct the jury as to the standard of conduct required of the defendant.
It is authoritatively shown that around 10 to 11 % of hospital admissions each year end in an 'adverse outcome' due to a medical incident.
Informed consentInformed consent is the type of consent that is most commonly an issue in a medical malpractice case. Before performing a medical procedure, a doctor or healthcare provider has a duty to warn the patient of the known risks involved.
When a patient refuses to sign an informed consent form. Competent patients have the right to not consent, or to refuse treatment. If one of your patients refuses to sign a consent form, do not proceed without further attempting to obtain the consent.
Failure to obtain consent properly can lead to problems including legal or disciplinary action against you, or rarely criminal prosecution for battery (contact with an individual without consent.)
There are 4 components of informed consent including decision capacity, documentation of consent, disclosure, and competency.
I understand that my participation is voluntary and that I am free to withdraw at any time, without giving a reason and without cost. I understand that I will be given a copy of this consent form. I voluntarily agree to take part in this study.
In both medical and legal terminology, this is called "informed consent." If a doctor does not get informed consent from a patient, and the patient is injured, the patient may have grounds to sue the doctor for medical malpractice.
Informed consent is a crucial part of enrolling in a clinical trial because it gives the potential participant all the information they need to understand what they are volunteering for. Without informed consent the subjects may not fully understand what they are participating in.
The moments after a patient threatens to sue for medical malpractice can be critical. How clinicians and risk managers react can affect the likelihood of a lawsuit and its outcome.
Confidence in quality of care does not negate the threat posed by a patient who wants to sue, says Jonathan C. LaMendola, JD, an attorney with Cobb Martinez Woodward in Dallas. Anytime a patient or patient’s family threatens to sue, it is a potentially serious matter — even if the standard of care was met, he says.
While the level of concern will be fact-specific, every credible threat of litigation should be assessed to some degree for its likelihood and potential exposure, says David Verschell, JD, partner with Abrams Fensterman in Lake Success, NY.
Stimmel says to always document conversations with the patient or family members. "It is very helpful in a trial, possibly four years later, to show the plaintiffs were demanding money immediately," she adds. If a patient or family threatens litigation prior to care, during care, or after care is provided, says Stimmel, ...
It is not uncommon for a patient or family member who is unhappy with the services he or she receives in the ED to make threatening statements about filing lawsuits, says Justin S. Greenfelder, JD, a health care attorney with Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs in Canton, OH.
In Carlotti v. Petta, Dr. Carlotti, a cosmetic surgeon, successfully sued his former patient – receiving a jury verdict of $12 million in December 2011. In 2007, Albert Carlotti, performed a number of procedures on Ms. Petta, a singer, including a rhinoplasty.
McKee sued the son in Minnesota court. The case was thrown out on summary judgment. Truth and opinion are two defenses to allegations of defamation. The judge concluded the review contained statements of opinion, true statements, and vague statements. Accordingly, the judge ruled against the doctor.
Section 230 is a federal law which makes it impossible to sue a web based platform for defamation. That said, if a doctor can identify the actual author of a defamatory post, he can sue that person. In the cases above, the doctor was able to easily identify the author.
In most cases, the answer is no. First, proving defamation is not easy. To prevail, you must prove that the defendant made a false statement to another person; and the statement harmed one’s reputation. If the statement was true, you will lose. If the statement was an opinion, you will lose.
The poorly written but voluminous record often increases the liability risk by providing the plaintiff’s attorney with ample material from which to choose the example to build the plaintiff’s case. A well-written medical record may influence the attorney to have the plaintiff drop the matter without further action.
Lawsuits often can be avoided if the nurses indicate they have followed up on a family’s concerns. Avoid using defensive, argumentative, blaming, and vague language. If another person’s entry requires action or follow-up, do it and document the response. The health care professional must use legible penmanship.
A well-written medical record may influence the attorney to have the plaintiff drop the matter without further action. Investing more time in record documentation can be beneficial and can help to avoid the stressful, expensive , and demoralizing effects of malpractice litigation.
Empty spaces give the impression that care was not delivered, side rails were not up as ordered, or the patient was not turned in bed or out of bed as required. The patient’s attorney will carefully scrutinize all of the forms in the medical record. A case may be decided on the failure to fill in a blank or check the patient care plan for instructions on whether, for example, a patient needs assistance with feeding or ambulation.
Failure to provide pertinent information at time of discharge can trigger a readmission and complications that can be traced to the inadequate discharge instructions. Always document evidence of patient noncompliance. Informed consent documentation is mandatory.
Avoid documenting the need for an action that is not going to be taken. Avoid direct disagreement with any other health professional in the record. If an injury occurs to a patient, do not make statements in the record about being careful prior to the injury. Do not blame others in the record.
Medical mishaps should be documented concisely. The incidents should not be overstated or misrepresented, but the mishaps should not be concealed or understated. Legal threats and complaints about the quality of care may be briefly documented in the patient’s record in a non-judgmental, neutral manner.
Improper care or unsafe conditions. You may have a complaint about improper care (like claims of abuse to a nursing home resident) or unsafe conditions (like water damage or fire safety concerns).
For questions about a specific service you got, look at your Medicare Summary Notice (MSN) or log into your secure Medicare account . You can file an appeal if you disagree with a coverage or payment decision made by one of these: 1 Medicare 2 Your Medicare health plan 3 Your Medicare drug plan
However, if the physician never formally terminated the physician-patient relationship, then, depending on the circumstances, the patient may have a reasonable expectation that the physician will continue to treat the patient.
A physician-patient relationship can be properly terminated in the following ways: 1 The physician and the patient mutually agree to terminate the relationship. 2 The patient unilaterally dismisses (fires) the physician. 3 The physician terminates the relationship after giving the patient notice and a reasonable amount of time to find another physician.
For a patient who is actively treating for a condition, a physician must: give the patient proper notice that the physician is terminating the physician-patient relationship , and. give the patient sufficient time to find another physician before finally refusing to treat the patient any further.
the patient needed continuing medical treatment. the physician stopped treating the patient. the physician did not give the patient enough time to find another doctor before the physician stopped his/her treatment of the patient. as a result of the physician's abandonment of the patient, the patient's condition was made worse.
Let's say that a physician stops seeing a patient without giving proper notice, and, as a result, the patient goes without medical treatment for three months. As a result of this three month gap in treatment, the patient is left with a permanent disability.
A patient's failure or inability to pay the physician's medical bill does not in itself terminate the physician-patient relationship. The physician may choose to terminate the relationship because the patient has not paid the bill, but the doctor still must give proper notice as described above.
Complaints doctors have about patients include everything from non-adherence to obnoxious behavior to missed appointments. When the complaints about one patient are just too much, a doctor may choose to terminate their relationship with that patient for any of those reasons, and for others, too.
If your doctor fires you, you have a few options: If you want to go back to that doctor, you may want to attempt to repair the relationship with your doctor. This will involve knowing what the reason was that you were dismissed (which may, or may not, be apparent).
From the provider's perspective, that means a window of no income in addition to the fact that the patient isn't getting the help they need.
Patient non-compliance ( non-adherence): When the patient fails to follow the treatment recommendations established by the doctor. (Which is why it is so important that you and your doctor make treatment decisions together .) Patient's failure to keep appointments: Patients make appointments, then cancel them at the last minute, ...
If the doctor's practice is closing: Just like the rest of us, doctors close their practices. They may sell them, or retire from practice, they may die, or just close their doors.
Patient's rude or obnoxious behavior: No patient should ever be rude or obnoxious. It's a form of abuse. Just as patients should fire a doctor who behaves this way, it's fair that a doctor should fire a patient for such poor behavior, too.
A cancer patient cannot be fired before his chemo or radiation treatments are completed. However, a patient who has been on a primary care doctor's roster, but hasn't visited that doctor in a year or two might be dismissed. That is not considered ongoing care.
If your doctor has failed to disclose the results of your medical exam, you may be entitled to legal relief. You should contact a personal injury lawyer as soon as possible while the events are still fresh in your recollection. An attorney can help specify your course of action if you have been injured as a result of your doctor’s errors.
A doctor might fail to disclose test results for several reasons. For one, they may simply forget to tell the patient about the test results. More often, test results can be lost or confused along the chain of communication in a hospital . Test results are often relayed between several different people, such as from a nurse to ...
These records and receipts may be useful in reminding yourself and others what tests have been performed on you and what test results you are currently entitled to receiving.
As the patient, you are entitled to know the results of your medical exams. All medical professionals are held to a high standard of medical care, and that standard of care includes informing the patient of the outcome of any medical test or examination, such as a colonoscopy or a mammogram, that is performed on them. Your doctor should also inform you of the purpose of the medical exam, and also of any dangers or side effects that might result from the exam.
Additionally , you may be able to file a medical malpractice lawsuit if your injury is particularly serious. You will have to prove in court that you received actual injuries as a result of the doctor’s failure to communicate test results. Also, you will need to prove that the failure to communicate test results is directly traceable to your doctor.