32 hours ago White and high SES respondents were about 1.5 times more likely to report excellent service compared with Black and low SES respondents, respectively. Conclusion: In South Africa, race and SES are not synonymous and can no longer be considered reliable proxy indicators of one another. Each has distinct and significant but different degrees of association with client … >> Go To The Portal
Patient satisfaction with health care providers in South Africa: the influences of race and socioeconomic status In South Africa, race and SES are not synonymous and can no longer be considered reliable proxy indicators of one another. Each has distinct and significant but different degrees of association with client satisfaction.
Patient satisfaction with healthcare services therefore, is based on a person’s expectations, opinions or state of mind at a time when they receive service. Once the encounter is viewed as positive or negative, the patient will be satisfied or dissatisfied.
Research examining patient satisfaction with health care provision in South Africa and, more specifically, the perceived quality of care given by the health care providers is limited. Moreover, the influence of race and SES on levels of patient satisfaction is relatively unexplored.
The first democratic government elected in South Africa in 1994 inherited huge inequalities in health status and health provision across all sections of the population. This study set out to assess, 4 years later, the influence of race and socioeconomic status (SES) on perceived quality of care from health care providers.
Traditionally, decisions about health services were made on the basis of health-provider and health authorities' views on what is in the best interest of the patient. This was based on a view that members of the general public lack the technical knowledge to make fully informed decisions themselves.
Traditionally, decisions about health services were made on the basis of health-provider and health authorities' views on what is in the best interest of the patient. This was based on a view that members of the general public lack the technical knowledge to make fully informed decisions themselves.