planned parenthood southerstearn pennsylvania patient portal

What services does Planned Parenthood offer?

Informed Consent & Patient Education. In preparation for your upcoming telehealth visit we ask that you review the documents below. You will be asked to sign any consent forms during your visit. New Patient Consents. Initial Consent and HIPAA. Starting Birth Control. (1) Consent Pills/ Patch/ Ring (2) How to use -The Pill (3) How to use -The ...

What is Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA v Casey?

The Patient Portal is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, so you are able to access your information, ask questions, and make requests on your schedule! For more info, review the Portal Instructions. My Patient Portal Create an Account Use your Portal to: View care summaries, test results, medication lists, and vaccination history

Who is the Attorney General for Planned Parenthood of Pennsylvania?

Welcome to the Planned Parenthood Patient Portal (P4): an on-line gateway to appointment scheduling, lab results, your medical chart, and more for patients of Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota.

What is the patient portal and how does it work?

Our Patient Services Department provides reproductive healthcare for over 40,000 individuals in Philadelphia, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, including STD testing and treatment, midlife services, family planning services, pre-natal care, colposcopy and cryotherapy procedures, and medical and surgical abortions. Population (s) Served.

Planned Parenthood Southeastern Pennsylvania

Come in for expert health care, honest answers, and personal attention.

Expert Health Care

Planned Parenthood is committed providing the expert, nonjudgmental health care. Our health centers are open and we are standing strong.

Getting Started

You will receive an email from the Health Center with instructions on how to access your patient portal and an enrollment code, called a token. Be sure to allow-list noreply@ppwp.org in your email client to ensure you receive this email.

Requesting Access to Medical Records and Lab Results

Once you have set up your account and logged into you patient portal, follow these instructions below to request that our automated system send your record to you Patient Portal. In some cases, this process may take up to 24 hours.

Contact Us

If you are having trouble with accessing records on your portal, feel free to call us at 412-434-8971. You may also send a message via the portal by following the instructions below.

Mission

It is PPSP's mission to protect and enhance reproductive freedom, to increase access to reproductive healthcare services and information, and to promote sexual health.

Operations

The people, governance practices, and partners that make the organization tick.

What did the O'Connor–Kennedy–Souter plurality overturn?

Although upholding the "essential holding" in Roe, and recognizing that women have some constitutional liberty to terminate their pregnancies, the O'Connor–Kennedy–Souter plurality overturned the Roe trimester framework in favor of a viability analysis. The Roe trimester framework completely forbade states from regulating abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy, permitted regulations designed to protect a woman's health in the second trimester, and permitted prohibitions on abortion during the third trimester (when the fetus becomes viable) under the justification of fetal protection, and so long as the life or health of the mother was not at risk. The plurality found that continuing advancements in medical technology had proven that a fetus could be considered viable at 23 or 24 weeks rather than at the 28 weeks previously understood by the Court in Roe. The plurality thus redrew the line of increasing state interest at viability because of increasing medical accuracy about when fetus viability takes place. Likewise, the authors of the plurality opinion felt that fetus viability was "more workable" than the trimester framework.

Who joined the plurality?

Justices Harry Blackmun and John Paul Stevens, who both joined the plurality in part, also each filed opinions concurring in the Court's judgment in part and dissenting in part. Chief Justice William Rehnquist filed an opinion concurring in the Court's judgment in part and dissenting in part, which was joined by Justices Byron White, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas, none of whom joined any part of the plurality. Justice Scalia also filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, which was also joined by Rehnquist, White, and Thomas.

What was the case in Roe v Wade?

Freind, arguing that the provisions were unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade. The Court in Roe was the first to establish abortion as a fundamental right protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The majority in Roe further held that women have a privacy interest protecting their right to abortion embedded in the liberty clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The five provisions at issue in Casey are summarized below.

What is undue burden?

A legal restriction posing an undue burden is one that has "the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus." An undue burden is found even where a statute purports to further the interest of potential life or another valid state interest, if it places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman's fundamental right to choice. The Supreme Court in the 2016 case Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt clarified exactly what the 'undue burden' test requires: " Casey requires courts to consider the burdens a law imposes on abortion access together with the benefits those laws confer." The Supreme Court further clarified in the 2020 June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo opinion written by Justice Stephen Breyer with respect to the undue burden standard: " [T]his standard requires courts independently to review the legislative findings upon which an abortion-related statute rests and to weigh the law’s “asserted benefits against the burdens” it imposes on abortion access. 579 U.S., at ___ (slip op., at 21) (citing Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U. S. 124, 165 (2007))." In Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt the court described the undue burden standard in its overall context with these words:

What is the outcome of the case of Russo v. Medical Services?

Russo case noted the key outcomes in Casey: "The several restrictions that did not impose a substantial obstacle were constitutional, while the restriction that did impose a substantial obstacle was unconstitutional." Before an abortion regulation can be struck down as unconstitutional there must be a determination that this regulation imposes a substantial obstacle in light of the undue burden standard explained in the section above. In Casey "the justices imposed a new standard to determine the validity of laws restricting abortions. The new standard asks whether a state abortion regulation has the purpose or effect of imposing an "undue burden," which is defined as a "substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability." The key judgement of Casey can be summed up as follows: "Under Casey, abortion regulations are valid so long as they do not pose a substantial obstacle and meet the threshold requirement of being “reasonably related” to a “legitimate purpose.” Id., at 878; id., at 882 (joint opinion)."

Was Casey a divided case?

Except for the three opening sections of the O'Connor–Kennedy–Souter opinion, Casey was a divided judgment, as no other sections of any opinion were joined by a majority of justices . However, the plurality opinion jointly written by Justices Souter, O'Connor and Kennedy is recognized as the lead opinion with precedential weight because each of its parts was concurred with by at least two other Justices, albeit different ones for each part.