patient portal adoption rates: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

by Edyth Morar 10 min read

Patient Portal Adoption Rates: A Systematic Literature …

1 hours ago Our meta-analysis showed an overall mean adoption rate of 52% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 42 to 62%). Rates differed markedly between study types: controlled experiments yielded a mean adoption rate of 71% (95% CI 64 to 79%), compared to 23% (95% CI, 13 to 33%) in … >> Go To The Portal


What is the adoption rate of adoption in clinical trials?

Our meta-analysis showed an overall mean adoption rate of 52% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 42 to 62%). Rates differed markedly between study types: controlled experiments yielded a mean adoption rate of 71% (95% CI 64 to 79%), compared to 23% (95% CI, 13 to 33%) in …

Do patient portals improve care processes and outcomes?

Sep 01, 2017 · DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-830-3-79 Corpus ID: 19055522. Patient Portal Adoption Rates: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis @article{Fraccaro2017PatientPA, title={Patient Portal Adoption Rates: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis}, author={Paolo Fraccaro and Markel Vigo and Panos Balatsoukas and Iain E. Buchan and Niels …

How many studies have been conducted to evaluate adoption of systems?

Patient portal adoption rates The overall mean adoption rate across all included studies was 52% (95% CI, 42 to 62%). When stratifying for study type, controlled experiments had a mean adoption rate of 71% (95% CI, 64 to 79%), compared to 23% (95% CI, 13 to 33%) for real-world experiments. The results from the meta-regression are shown in Table 2.

Similar Articles

To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.

Patients' adoption of and feature access within electronic patient portals

Elston Lafata J , Miller CA , Shires DA , Dyer K , Ratliff SM , Schreiber M

Adoption Strategies for Electronic Patient Portals: Employing Advanced Data Mining and Analytics

Bola J , Charow R , Hope J , Bakas V , Bishop L , Brudnicki S , Williams L , Wiljer D