2 hours ago Harry, a behavioral psychologist, is in the process of analyzing his patient maria valentines report. maria has been diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder (did). according to harry, severe … >> Go To The Portal
Behavior is considered to be abnormal when it is atypical or out of the ordinary, consists of undesirable behavior, and results in impairment in the individual's functioning. Abnormality in behavior, is that in which is considered deviant from specific societal, cultural and ethical expectations.
Negative symptoms experienced by people living with schizophrenia include: losing interest and motivation in life and activities, including relationships and sex. lack of concentration, not wanting to leave the house, and changes in sleeping patterns.
Which of the following best describes catatonia? It is a state of immobility and unresponsiveness lasting for long periods of time.
Answer and Explanation: A confounding variables is an extraneous variable that affects the variables being studied so that the results do not reflect an actual relationship between the variables under investigation. The confounding variable is the third variable that influences both dependent and independent variables.
Negative symptoms refer to an absence or lack of normal mental function involving thinking, behavior, and perception. You might notice: Lack of pleasure. The person may not seem to enjoy anything anymore.
The positive symptoms include hallucinations, delusions, illogical changes in behavior or thoughts, hyperactivity, and thought disorder.
Many people with panic disorder develop agoraphobia, which is marked by fear and avoidance of situations in which escape might be difficult or help might not be available if one were to develop symptoms of a panic attack.
A person with concurrent disorders will often have more serious medical, social and emotional problems than if they had only one condition. Treatment may take longer and be more challenging.
Dissociative disorders usually develop as a way to cope with trauma. The disorders most often form in children subjected to long-term physical, sexual or emotional abuse or, less often, a home environment that's frightening or highly unpredictable.
Confounding VariableExtraneous Variables vs Confounding Variable According to its name, the work of the confounding variables is to confuse the true effects of the independent variables across all levels. Because just as the independent variables, confounding variables also differ across the conditions that the researcher may introduce.
Internal validity. Internal validity refers to the extent to which the independent variable can accurately be stated to produce the observed effect. If the effect of the dependent variable is only due to the independent variable(s) then internal validity is achieved.
The dependent varible is defined as the thing which is being measured in an experiment, whilst the independent variable is the thing that is being manipulated or changed. Extraneous variables are undesirable variables that influence the relationship between the variables that the experimenter is observing.
Examples of avolition in schizophrenia might be the inability to care for personal hygiene or participate in work or recreational activities. Positive symptoms are behaviors or actions that aren't generally seen in people who don't have schizophrenia, although they may be present in other psychiatric disorders.
Risk factors Having a family history of schizophrenia. Some pregnancy and birth complications, such as malnutrition or exposure to toxins or viruses that may impact brain development. Taking mind-altering (psychoactive or psychotropic) drugs during teen years and young adulthood.
According to the Medical Research Council, the term schizophrenia is only about 100 years old. The disease was first identified as a mental illness by Dr. Emile Kraepelin in 1887 and the illness itself is generally believed to have accompanied mankind throughout history.
2.1 Two-Hit Hypothesis The two-hit hypothesis of schizophrenia suggests that a combination of genetic susceptibility coupled with a distinct developmental insult can prime an individual for a later event that ultimately leads to onset of the full clinical syndrome (Bayer et al., 1999).