7 hours ago · The Patient Health Information and Quality Improvement Act of 2000 6 introduced by Senate Health Committee Chairman Kemp Hannon and others, would tighten these reporting requirements by reducing from 60 days to 30 days the time within which hospitals have to conduct their investigations of incidents or to report physician problems. The proposed … >> Go To The Portal
The duty to warn arises when a patient has communicated an explicit threat of imminent serious physical harm or death to a clearly identified or identifiable victim or victims, and the patient has the apparent intent and ability to carry out such a threat.
Reasons for disclosure must be documented in the clinical record. This section imposes a mandatory duty to report on mental health professionals while protecting mental health professionals who discharge the duty in good faith from both civil and criminal liability. No information. No Duty to Warn/Protect. See Gregory v.
PHL §2805-1 (2) requires that the following Incidents must be reported to the Department of Health: patients' deaths or impairments of bodily functions in circumstances other than those related to the natural course of illness, disease or proper treatment in accordance with generally accepted medical standards;
Mandatory reporting laws, say some professionals, may discourage people from seeking professional help or fully disclosing their intentions; or providers may be reluctant to treat potentially violent patients because they fear liability for failure to properly fulfill the duty to warn.
Be responsible for their own health. Maximize healthy habits such as exercising, not smoking, and eating a healthy diet. Prevent the spread of their disease. Work with healthcare providers to make healthcare decisions and carry out upon treatment plans.
In the simplest terms, a duty to act is a legal duty requiring a party to take necessary action to prevent harm to another person or to the general public.
The main use of a patient report form is to capture information about a patient at the point of care. Once created, a patient report form allows a medical professional to provide other personnel with the medical history of a patient.
A patient has the right to respectful care given by competent workers. A patient has the right to know the names and the jobs of his or her caregivers. A patient has the right to privacy with respect to his or her medical condition. A patient's care and treatment will be discussed only with those who need to know.
Nurses have a duty to uphold the standards of their profession. As such, they have a commitment to help care for and protect their patients while also protecting their own right to self-preservation and self- care. Nurses need to be proactive to address such issues.
For example, a doctor would owe you a duty of care to make sure that they give you proper medical attention, but would not owe you a duty of care in other areas like taking care of your finances.
Public reporting of health care quality data allows consumers, patients, payers, and health care providers to access information about how clinicians, hospitals, clinics, long-term care (LTC) facilities, and insurance plans perform on health care quality measures.
Most importantly, communication supports the foundation of patient care. So, hand-off reporting during shift change is a critical process that is crucial in protecting a patient's safety. Throughout the hand-off report, it is vital to provide accurate, up-to-date, and pertinent information to the oncoming nurse.
Incident reporting in healthcare refers to collecting healthcare incident data with the goal to improve patient safety and care quality. Done well, it identifies safety hazards and guides the development of interventions to mitigate risks, thereby reducing harm.
Your Legal Rights as a Patient in the American Healthcare SystemThe Right to Be Treated with Respect.The Right to Obtain Your Medical Records.The Right to Privacy of Your Medical Records.The Right to Make a Treatment Choice.The Right to Informed Consent.The Right to Refuse Treatment.More items...•
One of the recommendations to reduce medication errors and harm is to use the “five rights”: the right patient, the right drug, the right dose, the right route, and the right time.
Right to personal dignity and to receive care without any form of stigma and discrimination. Accommodating and respecting their special needs such as spiritual and cultural preferences. Right to confidentiality about their medical condition.
The problem is that this information is not well coordinated or used strategically to advance the goal of a transparent, proactively oriented system of reporting adverse events or problems in health care. New channels of information-sharing – with appropriate privacy/confidentiality protections – are needed to make it possible for disparate organizations to work together more closely in addressing and preventing adverse events or problems in health care. Included should be a reassessment of statutory requirements that limit data-sharing between state medical boards, federal agencies, the law enforcement community and others. In addition, stakeholders in health care should work together to create more unified, consistent and better aligned systems of reporting and recording adverse events or problems so they can be more efficiently shared. Finally, in the new environment of rapidly growing databases, better data-articulation is needed – that is, systems that can more effectively flag and prioritize issues for attention. The issue to be addressed isn’t as much a lack of information as it is better utilizing the information that already exists.
Participants noted that in addition to legal and jurisdictional restrictions, many long-held institutional procedures may impact the flow and sharing of information. For example, many state medical boards share only what is categorized as public information, and this often does not include minor disciplinary measures, such as letters of reprimand. In Medicare investigations, no report is issued until there is a conviction; meanwhile much potentially important information is gathered. Hospitals may have various levels of “formal” and “informal” reporting of issues, and other institutions don’t have access to the results of “informal” reporting – despite the fact that this information, too, could be impactful. Other kinds of potentially useful data are also heavily restricted, including peer-review reports in hospitals and mental health records.
In addition, in smaller communities, health care workers may be reluctant to report the actions of their peers for fear of losing patient referrals or professional ostracization.
Common impediments to the flow of information are widespread statutory and legal restrictions imposed upon institutions. As an example, participants discussed state laws that restrict what kinds of information about disciplined physicians that medical boards can share across state lines. Similarly, federal institutions, such as the Veterans Health Administration, face legal limits to what kinds of information they may share outside the VA system. Similar restrictions apply to large databases, such as the National Practitioner Data Bank, as well as hospitals, insurers and other stakeholders in health care. Participants noted that an institution’s contractual agreements – common in hospitals, for example – may also restrict what information can be shared with others.
Participants noted that state medical societies and other associations with members who are health care practitioners are underutilized as potential partners in a more effective system of information-sharing and reporting. This is because such organizations have traditionally not played a strong role in disciplinary or regulatory matters, as their primary purpose is to advocate for their members. Still, participants noted that health practitioner associations have infrastructure, data, and other tools and resources that could help in an effort to better share information and encourage reporting at the front lines of patient care.
One of the most significant issues contributing to issues with information-sharing is a lack of integration and coordination between the vast databases being compiled by various stakeholder organizations in health care. Participants noted that much data exists that could be helpful in targeting issues in patient care, but more effort is needed to make this information more widely shared. Confidentiality and privacy concerns make this discussion complicated and contribute to a lack of greater reporting.
The statutory limitations that impact state regulators, hospitals and others are also a prime cause for a lack of information-flow between law enforcement agencies and health care institutions – an issue that participants noted often causes public tension. Law enforcement investigators work under restrictive procedures that often require withholding information about criminal activities of health care practitioners for periods of time; when the information eventually becomes available publicly, the lack of active coordination and sharing with health care organizations may be criticized as a gap in public protection. Media reports of criminal activity in health care practitioners in recent years have frequently noted these communication gaps as an important issue beyond the crime itself.
In Brief. Nurses are the final checkpoint for providing safe care and have a moral obligation to uphold trust within the patient relationship. You're the circulating nurse in a room where a gynecologist is performing an anterior/posterior repair.
Event report examples in the OR 1 Delay in starting the surgical case 2 Patient identification error 3 Unplanned return to the OR (postoperative bleeding, postoperative infection) 4 Reintubation of patient postoperatively in the surgical suite 5 Dental injury by anesthesia provider 6 Repeated attempts at intubation with trauma to airway 7 Aspiration 8 Break in aseptic technique 9 Positioning injury 10 Objects left in patient 11 Equipment malfunction or failure 12 Skin integrity impairment preoperative or postoperative 13 Additional procedures performed than indicated on the consent form 14 Incorrect needle or instrument counts 15 Medication errors 16 Consent issues 17 Wrong site or wrong patient surgery 18 Unplanned removal of an organ or portion of an organ
The consent for the anterior/posterior repair cited in the above scenario contains a section that allows the patient to stipulate what, if anything, he or she doesn't want the surgeon to do intraoperatively (such as no blood transfusions). Many patients write "none" and initial their response. This response theoretically allows the surgeon to do what he feels is necessary and in the best interest of the patient. How far a surgeon can digress from the procedure stated on the consent, however, is unclear and situation-dependent.
Reportable incidents or events are occurrences that aren't consistent with the routine operation of the healthcare facility and that may result in injury, harm, or loss to a patient or visitor. 1 The purpose of medical error reporting is to help institutions identify potential and actual risks in order to reduce or eliminate hazardous environments, procedures, equipment, and patient outcomes, thereby improving the quality of patient care. 2
A surgical patient who meets the Surgical Care Improvement Project protocol requires a specific antibiotic (assuming no allergies) within 1 hour of incision. Neither the same-day surgery unit nor the OR carry the ordered antibiotic in their units. The surgeon neglects to wait for the order to be sent to the pharmacy and delivered to the OR. As a result, the patient doesn't receive the antibiotic prior to incision.
Medical errors are mistakes made in defining the diagnosis or implementing the treatment plan. 3 Medication errors are a common example. Was the medication the wrong drug dose, route, or timing interval? Or, was the medication given to the wrong patient? Was the diagnosis delayed or were the results of a test not interpreted and acted upon in a timely manner? Was the treatment administered incorrectly or delayed? Did the equipment fail to function properly or cause an injury?
Incidents that create near-misses, adverse events, sentinel events, or potential litigation issues invol ving employees, patients, visitors, physicians, students, or volunteers should be documented using the event reporting system. (See Definitions .) This report should be completed as soon as possible to avoid memory lapses or information distortion. Only objective facts belong on the event report—it isn't the forum for opinions, assumptions, or an emotional display of feelings. The questions, "Who," "What," "Where," "How," and "When" guide the type of information required on the report. Documentation should be clear, concise, and complete with details. 2
Under ethical standards tracing back to the Roman Hippocratic Oath, doctors and mental health professionals usually must maintain the confidentiality of information disclosed to them by patients in the course of the doctor-patient relationship. With some exceptions codified in state and federal law, health professionals can be legally liable for breaching confidentiality. One exception springs from an effort to protect potential victims from a patient’s violent behavior. California courts imposed a legal duty on psychotherapists to warn third parties of patients’ threats to their safety in 1976 in Tarasoff v. The Regents of the University of California. This case triggered passage of “duty to warn” or “duty to protect” laws in almost every state as summarized in the map and, in more detail, in the chart below.
Behavioral health professional - client privilege does not extend when the professional has a duty to (1) inform victims and appropriate authorities that a client's condition indicates a clear and imminent danger to the client or others; or (2) to report information required by law.
Places communications between client and a licensed psychologist on the same basis as those of attorney client privilege. Privilege does not extend when psychologist has a duty to report as required by law. Applies to support staff as well.
Mandatory reporting laws, say some professionals, may discourage people from seeking professional help or fully disclosing their intentions; or providers may be reluctant to treat potentially violent patients because they fear liability for failure to properly fulfill the duty to warn.
There shall be no monetary liability on the part of, and no cause of action shall arise against, any person who is a licensed marriage and family therapist in failing to predict and warn of and protect from a patient's violent behavior except where the patient has communicated a serious threat of physical violence against a reasonably identifiable victim or victims. The duty shall be discharged by making reasonable efforts to communicate the threat to the victim or victims and to a law enforcement agency. Immunity is provided for from suit relating to disclosure of confidential information.
The box allows you to conduct a full text search or type the state name.
California courts imposed a legal duty on psychotherapists to warn third parties of patients’ threats to their safety in 1976 in Tarasoff v. The Regents of the University of California.
Recognize what conduct needs to be reported to meet ethical and legal duties and to avoid ramifications.
The duty to report incompetent, unethical, and illegal conduct is grounded in the realm of ethics and law. The nurses’ ethical obligation to the patient can be found in The Nightingale Pledge, created in 1893. The pledge cites the following key provisions:
Illegal conduct is perhaps easiest to identify, since it has already been defined by the laws of each state. As mentioned, most states have laws mandating that child and elder abuse be reported.
In situations of abuse, many state statutes require that an oral report be made immediately, followed by a written report that’s submitted to a specified agency.
To encourage reporting, laws have been enacted to protect mandated reporters from legal liability. For example, many states provide that the reported abuse must be made based on a good faith belief that the facts reported are true. That is, the nurse’s assessment gives rise to a reasonable belief that abuse has occurred.
American Nurses Association:Code for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. Washington, D.C.: American Nurses Association, 1985.
HIPAA permits a covered health care provider to notify a patient’s family members of a serious and imminent threat to the health or safety of the patient or others if those family members are in a position to lessen or avert the threat. Thus, to the extent that a provider determines that there is a serious and imminent threat ...
A health care provider’s “duty to warn” generally is derived from and defined by standards of ethical conduct and State laws and court decisions such as Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. HIPAA permits a covered health care provider to notify a patient’s family members of a serious and imminent threat to the health or safety ...
Thus, to the extent that a provider determines that there is a serious and imminent threat of a patient physically harming self or others, HIPAA would permit the provider to warn the appropriate person (s) of the threat, consistent with his or her professional ethical obligations and State law requirements.
“If a therapist fails to take reasonable steps to protect the intended victim from harm, he or she may be liable to the intended victim or his family if the patient acts on the threat ,” Reischer said.
Therapists are held to very high ethical standards by their governing state board and a violation of those ethics could result in fines, loss of licensure, or even jail time , said Walwyn-Duqesnay. While each state has its own set of guidelines and regulations on what its mental health professionals are required to report, there are common themes that transcend across the country.
Therapy is where you can share your deepest, darkest secrets, fears and vulnerabilities with the expectation that you won’t be judged and what you say won’t be shared. In fact, that’s the whole point of the whole process.
In the case of suspected child abuse, therapists must file a report if they have “reasonable suspicion” about child abuse.
Cinéas said a therapist may have to step in and report a situation when vulnerable people are threatened, which could include children, elderly individuals and those living with a disability.
“If a client experienced child abuse but is now 18 years of age then the therapist is not required to make a child abuse report, unless the abuser is currently abusing other minors,” Mayo said.
A therapist may be forced to report information disclosed by the patient if a patient reveals their intent to harm someone else. However, this is not as simple as a patient saying simply they “would like to kill someone,” according to Jessica Nicolosi, a clinical psychologist in Rockland County, New York. There has to be intent plus a specific identifiable party who may be threatened.