21 hours ago Mar 10, 2021 · Question: A patient with cirrhosis develops portal hypertension as indicated by the presence of: splenomegaly. Correctbleeding gums.jaundice.muscle wasting. Explanation: Development of portal hypertension is related to the obstruction to portal blood flow which causes an increase in portal venous pressure resulting in splenomegaly, ascites, and collateral … >> Go To The Portal
Mar 10, 2021 · Question: A patient with cirrhosis develops portal hypertension as indicated by the presence of: splenomegaly. Correctbleeding gums.jaundice.muscle wasting. Explanation: Development of portal hypertension is related to the obstruction to portal blood flow which causes an increase in portal venous pressure resulting in splenomegaly, ascites, and collateral …
Jun 04, 2021 · Portal hypertension is the driver of complications in cirrhosis, such as ascites and gastro-oesophageal varices (which can haemorrhage), as well as hepatic encephalopathy due to portosystemic shunting, hepatorenal syndrome and hypersplenism.5 Patients with complications of portal hypertension show repeating readmissions in the hospital and are described as …
Apr 08, 2015 · Portal hypertension is the main prognostic factor in cirrhosis. The recent emergence of potent antiviral drugs and new algorithm of treatment for the management of complications due to portal hypertension have sensibly changed our perception of cirrhosis that can be now considered as a multistage liver disease whose mortality risk can be reduced by a …
The study of the natural history of patients with lower HVPG has been sparse. In this study, long-term survival and the risk of complications in mild portal hypertension were analysed. Material and methods: Sixty-one patients with cirrhosis and HVPG below 10 mmHg were included in the study. Data were collected from medical files and National ...
Portal hypertension is a leading side effect of cirrhosis. Your body carries blood to your liver through a large blood vessel called the portal vein. Cirrhosis slows your blood flow and puts stress on the portal vein. This causes high blood pressure known as portal hypertension.3 Jan 2020
The most common cause of portal hypertension is cirrhosis, or scarring of the liver. Cirrhosis results from the healing of a liver injury caused by hepatitis, alcohol abuse or other causes of liver damage. In cirrhosis, the scar tissue blocks the flow of blood through the liver and slows its processing functions.16 Nov 2017
Portal hypertension is elevated pressure in your portal venous system. The portal vein is a major vein that leads to the liver. The most common cause of portal hypertension is cirrhosis (scarring) of the liver.
Liver disease such as cirrhosis, or liver scarring, can cause the blockage of blood flow through the liver, thus causing blood to back up in the portal vein resulting in increased pressure or portal hypertension. As a result, the spleen becomes engorged with blood, leading to splenomegaly.
Definition and Etiology. Ascites is defined as the accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity. It is a common clinical finding, with various extraperitoneal and peritoneal causes ( Box 1 ), but it most often results from liver cirrhosis.
Because liver transplantation is associated with 2-year survival rates of almost 85%, it should be considered as an important treatment option in all appropriate patients. Many with ascites will develop infection, most often without a known precipitating factor (such as diverticulitis, bowel perforation, etc).
If trace ascites is present, the patient may be asymptomatic and fluid can be detected only on physical or radiologic examination. If a large amount of fluid is present, the patient might complain of abdominal fullness, early satiety, abdominal pain, or shortness of breath.
Ascites is the most common major complication of cirrhosis and is an important landmark in the natural history of chronic liver disease. If observed for 10 years, approximately 60% of patients with cirrhosis develop ascites requiring therapy.
Our opinion is that for a highly functional outpatient with documented cirrhosis, the new development of ascites does not routinely require paracentesis. Cirrhotic patients should, however, undergo paracentesis in the case of unexplained fever, abdominal pain, or encephalopathy or if they are admitted to the hospital for any cause. It is common for hospitalized cirrhotic patients to have infected ascites fluid (spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, SBP) even if no symptoms are present. This is particularly true in the case of a significant gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
A rapid reduction of ascites is often accomplished simply with the addition of low-dose oral diuretics in the outpatient setting. First-line diuretic therapy for cirrhotic ascites is the combined use of spironolactone (Aldactone) and furosemide (Lasix).
Large-volume ascites is defined as intraperitoneal fluid in an amount that significantly limits the activities of daily life. With additional fluid retention, the abdomen can become progressively distended and painful. This is commonly referred to as massive or tense ascites.
The main reasons for the lack of treatment strategies in the field of portal hypertension may be the complexity of the pathophysiological processes and the counterplay of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic systems. Therefore, there is a clear role of microbiome-targeted and omics-guided diagnosis and therapy of portal hypertension. Especially in the era of minimal-invasive and personalized medicine as well as artificial intelligence, we need to open the field to the scientists and experts with a wide range of background and liaison them to develop systems medicine and personalized approaches. Introduction of the advanced technologies to the field, such as endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of portal hypertension, cell-specific therapies using drug-carriers to either target LSEC or HSC without or with only minor systemic effects, will significantly improve patients care.
LSECs have fenestrae of approximately 0.1 microns organized into groups of sieve plates, which facilita te the transport of macromolecules from the hepatic sinusoids to the space of Disse, then to HSCs and hepatocytes. Additionally, a unique feature of LSECs distinguishing them from endothelial cells in other organs is the lack of a basement membrane, which allows efficient movement of macromolecules between the lumen of the sinusoid and the space of Disse ( 7 ). Loss of fenestrae and appearance of a basement membrane in LSECs is termed “capillarization” ( 8, 9 ). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been known as a key factor that maintains the fenestrae without basement membrane ( 10) through endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS)-derived nitric oxide (NO) signaling ( 11 ). A study showed that removal of VEGF signaling in transgenic mice, in which liver-specific secretion of a soluble VEGF decoy receptor inactivates endogenous VEGF, results in a loss of LSEC fenestration and portal hypertension as well as HSC activation independent of hepatic parenchymal damage. Administration of VEGF to these mice ameliorated portal hypertension ( 12 ). In addition, the composition of collagen in the space of Disse may play a role in maintenance or a loss of endothelial fenestration ( 13 ). A recent study in mice showed that Dll4, a ligand of the Notch signaling pathway with a predominant expression in endothelial cells (ECs) promotes LSEC capillarization by basement membrane formation ( 14 ). Additionally, this study showed that Dll4 knockdown in human LSEC cell line decreased extracellular matrix (ECM) expression while its overexpression showed an increase in ECM proteins including collagens, fibronectin and laminin, confirming the role of Dll4 in LSEC capillarization (14).
Hepatic cells. Among the hepatic cells involved in the development of portal hypertension, LSECs and HSCs are directly involved in the increased hepatic resistance. Thus, their modulation may on the one side relieve the pressure and on the other side improve on the longer run liver fibrosis.
The liver stiff ness may induce a mechanical increase of the hepatic resistance and at least aggravate portal hyperetension. The physical and chemical properties of the environment, in which HSCs are embedded, are also important for their activation ( 34 ), at least partly via Src and RhoA pathways ( 35 ). The majority of the fibrotic material is synthesized by HSC, and together with other cells they contribute to the perpetuated remodelling of the matrix, reviewed elsewhere ( 36, 37 ). The stiffness of the matrix is provided, among other mechanisms, by the crosslinking of collagens, which leads to a less reversible fibrosis ( 38 ). The stiffness itself may further boost the activation of HSC, and the activated HSC may migrate to those fibrosis spots due to the so called durotaxis ( 39 ), which has been shown for fibroblasts ( 40 ), and may be likely to occur in HSC as well. Moreover, the swelling of HSC , e.g. in the presence of hyperammonia may activate HSC and induce their contraction ( 41 ). This may further lead to aggravation of fibrosis and thereby increase in liver stiffness, one of the main features of clinical significant portal hypertension in humans ( 42 ).
HSC is the hepatic pericyte involved in the vessel formation and stabilization ( 43 ). In this role, HSCs follow the transformation of LSEC upon injury (see above) and also drive LSEC transformation by release of VEGF, which works in a paracrine and autocrine manner on LSECs and HSCs ( 43 ). Especially, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is an important factor, which not only recruits HSCs in their pericyte function, but also by boosting fibrogenic potential in these cells. The boost in hepatic angiogenesis is probably meant to be a repair mechanism, but it aggravates the liver pathology and does not alleviate portal hypertension ( 43, 44 ). The reason is that these newly formed vessels are different from the sinusoidal vasculature, and do not increase the blood perfusion of the cirrhotic liver, but they further impair the homeostasis of hepatocytes and aggravate liver damage, further fuel fibrosis and inflammation ( 45 ). In experimental work several anti-angiogenic strategies have shown to be beneficial for portal hypertension, which at least was in part due to improved fibrosis ( 46, 47, 48, 49 ). Further targets to be addressed maybe Vasohibin-1 ( 50) and placental growth factor (PlGF) ( 51 ). But in these studies, the effect on portal hypertension was at least partially due to the anti-angiogenic effect on the extrahepatic angiogenesis. Since the hepatic resistance is at least partly dependent on the fibrosis, it is difficult, or even impossible to separate the role of intrahepatic angiogenesis on portal hypertension from the role on fibrosis. Along the transdifferentiation of HSC, the fibrogenic and angiogenic potential increases with the development of a myofibroblastic apparatus enabling contraction. Contraction is the dynamic part of hepatic resistance.
It was thought that portosystemic collaterals are an opening of pre-existing vessels, but a study by Sieber and colleagues was the first to indicate the evidence of angiogenesis-driven collateral vessel formation in portal hypertensive rats using a device consisting of collagen type I-filled teflon ring, which was implanted into the mesenteric bed for the assessment of angiogenesis ( 85 ). Although initial collateral formation likely develops due to the opening of pre-existing vessels, accumulating evidence has resulted in a consensus that most portosystemic collateral vessels are formed through angiogenesis.
HRS is the maximal form of kidney dysfunction in cirrhosis and is basically a functional failure due to intrarenal vascoconstriction, but also at least partly induced by the decreased effective arterial blood volume, following long-standing portal hypertension and hyperdynamic circulation ( 166 ).