33 hours ago · A: This question touches on several concepts essentially at the core of CDI practices. I think you are confusing three definitions: Primary diagnosis. Principal diagnosis. Secondary diagnosis. Let’s take each of these individually. The primary diagnosis is often confused with the principal diagnosis. In the inpatient setting, the primary ... >> Go To The Portal
(1) Year published, (2) country, (3) healthcare environment, (4) number of patient complaints, (5) number of issues reported within a complaint, (6) characteristics of complainer, (7) gender of patient, (8) focus of complaints (medical or nursing staff) and (9) suggestion or implementation of interventions. Data analysis.
Furthermore, patient complaint data can be interpreted and analysed through concepts and literatures that appear associated with the category and domain levels. For example, theory on communication and dialogue, 84 compassion and caring, 85
J Consum Satisfaction Dissatisfaction Complaining Behav 2002;15:13–21. . Complaints from emergency department patients largely result from treatment and communication problems. Emerg Med 2002;14:43–9. . Complaints against an EMS system.
The aim of the review is to outline the practices used to code and analyse patient complaints, and to describe the types and prevalence of issues underlying patient complaints.
How to Handle Patient ComplaintsListen to them. As basic as it may sound, this is your first and most important step when dealing with an unhappy patient. ... Acknowledge their feelings. ... Ask questions. ... Explain and take action. ... Conclude. ... Document complaints.
A secondary complaint is a second, less severe problem with the patient, which may or may not be directly related to the chief complaint. (If you have not done so already) Add a new incident, or open an existing incident, as described Add or edit an incident.
What is the Chief Complaint (CC)? The CC is a brief statement that describes the symptom, problem, diagnosis, or other reason for the patient encounter. The CC is usually stated in the patient's own words: “I have an upset stomach, my knees ache, and I need refills on my pain pills.”
In the patient's medical record, document exactly what you saw and heard. Start with the date and time the incident occurred, the location, and who was present. Describe the patient's violent behavior and record exactly what you and the patient said in quotes.
Primary Problems which cause the business pain and must be fixed or secondary problems will occur. Secondary Problems which are the effects (or outcome) of the primary problem and are often viewed as the main problem in crisis management.
Place your ear over the patient's mouth and look, listen and feel for 10 seconds. Ask yourself is the patient breathing normally, and not taking occasional gasps of air. If patient is breathing normally carry out a secondary survey. If in any doubt patient is breathing normally dial 999.
Thank the patient for bringing the concern to your attention. Accept the patient's feelings, and if appropriate, offer a statement of empathy such as “I understand your frustration” or “I'm sorry that your wait time today was longer than expected”, without admitting fault or placing blame.
A chief complaint should comprise a concise statement describing the symptom, problem, condition, diagnosis, physician-recommended return or other factors that establish the reason for the encounter in the patient's own words (e.g., aching joints, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, fatigue, etc.).
A Chief complaint is the medical term used to describe the primary problem of the patient that led the patient to seek medical attention and of which they are most concerned.
How to respond to inappropriate patient requestsF: Recognize any uncomfortable feelings that stem from the patient's request. ... A: Analyze why the patient's request makes you feel uncomfortable. ... V: View the patient in the best possible light. ... E: Explicitly state why the request is inappropriate. ... R: Reestablish rapport.
If a patient's behavior…is making you uncomfortable or causing you to feel unsafe, leave the situation immediately. Your personal safety and well-being are the most important. Federal laws on sexual harassment apply regardless of whether the harassment is taking place at a hospital or a doctor's office.”
When a patient exhibits disruptive behavior, Baker says, an incident report should be produced and reviewed by management to determine whether to contact the patient for "his side of the story." It should also cover whether that patient will be dismissed from the practice, who will communicate with that patient about ...
Patient complaints usually refer to an ‘expression of grievance’ and ‘dispute within a health care setting’. 10 They are often formal letters written to a healthcare organisation (or regulator) after a threshold of dissatisfaction with care has been crossed. 11 Typically, complaints are made by patients or families. 12 To resolve complaints, healthcare institutions usually create dialogue on the complaint, investigate it and reach a resolution for the individual patient (eg, apologise, reject, compensate). 10 In considering how patient complaint data might be used to identify or reduce problems in patient safety, a number of distinguishing features of patient complaints require discussion.
Patient complaints provide a valuable source of insight into safety-related problems within healthcare organisations. 1 Patients are sensitive to, and able to recognise, a range of problems in healthcare delivery, 2 some of which are not identified by traditional systems of healthcare monitoring (eg, incident reporting systems, retrospective case reviews). 3 Thus, patient complaints can provide important and additional information to healthcare organisations on how to improve patient safety. 4 Furthermore, analysing data on negative patient experiences strengthens the ability of healthcare organisations to detect systematic problems in care. This has recently been highlighted in the UK through the Francis report 5 on 1200 unnecessary deaths that occurred over 3 years at Mid-Staffordshire NHS Foundation hospital. The report found that, over the duration of the incident, written patients complaints had identified the problems of neglect and poor care at the trust. Yet, deficiencies in complaint handling meant critical warning signs were missed, and numerous challenges in using patient complaint data to improve patient safety were highlighted. 6
First, they allow for the concerns of specific patients to be met, for redress to occur and for solutions to be designed for solving case-specific safety problems. Second, they can provide insight into system-wide problems in patient care and allow for comparisons between healthcare organisations. The latter requires aggregate analyses of patient complaints in order that patient complaint data can be used to identify safety and quality issues within healthcare systems or conditions (eg, management problems) that increase the likelihood of poor care. Of the 59 papers reviewed in this study, patients were found to complain almost equally on the domains of ‘clinical’, ‘management’ and ‘relationships’. Some institutional factors appear more specific to certain healthcare systems (eg, finance and billing in the USA), while others are more generic (eg, delays). Overall, 39% of complaint issues focus on two of the seven categories, ‘communication’ and ‘treatment’, and a further 13% of complaint issues relate to ‘safety’.
Across the 59 papers, 729 issue codes were used to code the 88 069 complaints, and the number of issues totalled 113 551 (ranging from 29 42 to 26 785 47 ). The number of issue codes used to analyse complaints varied from 4 65 to 43, 47 with a mean of 12.2 (SD 10.3) codes. After collapsing issue codes on the basis of similarity (see figure 2 ), 205 unique issue codes remained. Of these, 103 involved the amalgamation of data from at least two studies. Overall, 84 issue codes were classified as miscellaneous (accounting for 2388 issues) as they referred to codes that were unclassifiable (eg, ‘other’).
Finally, of the 55 articles reporting who did the coding of complaints, 33% were done by the authors, 27% were done by a complaints department, 16% were done by healthcare staff, and 10% were done by patients or their advocates. No study graded complaints by severity or reported inter-rater reliability in coding complaints.
Conclusions Rigorous analyses of patient complaints will help to identify problems in patient safety. To achieve this, it is necessary to standardise how patient complaints are analysed and interpreted. Through synthesising data from 59 patient complaint studies, we propose a coding taxonomy for supporting future research and practice in the analysis of patient complaint data.
Second, the taxonomy should be used to structure the analysis and interpretation of patient complaint data. For example, in understanding where within the care process problems occurred (ie, identified by the use of the taxonomy to analyse patient complaints), their severity (eg, threat to patient safety) and their impact upon patient outcomes (eg, harm). An underlying flaw in patient complaint research is the mixing of data on stages of care (eg, examinations, treatment) and more generic problems (eg, communication, staff skills), and further conceptual development is required to better understand how these interact within the taxonomy.
Improper care or unsafe conditions. You may have a complaint about improper care (like claims of abuse to a nursing home resident) or unsafe conditions (like water damage or fire safety concerns). To file a complaint about improper care or unsafe conditions in a hospital, home health agency, hospice, or nursing home, ...
For questions about a specific service you got, look at your Medicare Summary Notice (MSN) or log into your secure Medicare account . You can file an appeal if you disagree with a coverage or payment decision made by one of these: 1 Medicare 2 Your Medicare health plan 3 Your Medicare drug plan
CPT defines the CC as “A concise statement describing the symptom, problem, condition, diagnosis, or other factor that is the reason for the encounter, usually stated in the patient’s words.”. Simply stated, the chief complaint is a description of why the patient is presenting for healthcare services. An easily identifiable chief complaint is the ...
Preventive medicine services (CPT® 99381-99387) do not require a chief complaint. Because a preventive medicine service is not problem-oriented, you should not diagnose it, as such. Instead, match preventive medicine codes with an appropriate ICD-9-CM code to support the services provided (e.g., V70.0 Routine general medical examination ...
Do not confuse the CC with the history of present illness (HPI);they are separate elements. The CC is the reason why the patient is there. The HPI details the CC. Although the CC directs the line of questioning in the HPI and the Review of Systems (ROS), the extent of history obtained should not be more than is medically necessary to evaluate the patient. According to the CMS Evaluation and Management Services Guide, “The CC, ROS, and PFSH may be listed as separate elements of history or they may be included in the description of the history of present illness.”
Once you have all the information and have decided a plan to address the individual’s concerns, you can write the response.
Outline#N#The following structure may be used when writing letters: 1 Acknowledgment of the problem, impact on the individual and distress caused and apology. 2 Summary of events 3 Explanation & clarification of misunderstandings or misconceptions, and acknowledgment of deficient care if appropriate 4 Actions that will occur as a result of the complaint and investigation 5 Close with final apology and details of who to contact in the case of further questions
Before writing the letter, you need to understand exactly what happened by accessing patient records and speaking with staff involved if possible. Is there a deficiency in care or has the complaint highlighted an area where change in practice could avoid future adverse events or dissatisfaction? Is the complaint reasonable or does the complainant have unrealistic expectations? It’s rare that there is nothing to learn from a patient who has taken the time to write a complaint and the approach to understanding the situation must be with an open mind.
Sometimes they will agree that on that occasion their professionalism slipped and they may be able to explain why (e.g. long working hours, heavy patient load or recent professional or personal distressing event). It is appropriate to tell that patient that you have spoken with the member of staff concerned and that they express regret about what happened. If the staff member outright denies any communication issue, they still need to reflect on the fact that whatever took place, it resulted in an upset patient. Sometimes differences are unresolvable, however we can still express regret at their unhappy experience.
When constructing your response, it can be helpful to constantly imagine yourself in the patient’s shoes as they read your letter, having experienced what they have, their level of knowledge about medical matters and their lived experience of the event. As you write, think about how the words you choose make them feel, add to their understanding of the situation and help them psychologically heal.
Sometimes, however, patients specifically request a written reply or decline a face-to-face meeting.
3. Always code the reason why the patient sought medical advice as the primary diagnosis. 4. Do not code “probably,” “possible” or “rule-out” diagnoses. When the patient’s diagnosis. is not definite, you should code signs and symptoms until the diagnosis is definite.
I was taught to code the diagnosis, and to only code symptoms if there isn't a diagnosis. In this case, you have a diagnosis. Coding the symptoms instead of the diagnosis could be viewed as upcoding.
The purpose of this report is to share rates of complaints and grievances, and describe their frequency, type, and level of severity at a large academic medical center. Unlike other similar systems, we also manage employee-generated requests to assist with patient issues and share these data in this report. Our goal is to highlight the value of these data to establish internal and external benchmarks to inform improvements in health care nationwide.
The classification is the category (ies) or type of concerns that a patient or representative’s grievance relates. The classification is documented by the Ombudsman based upon the specific issues raised during their investigation. The patient or their representative’s complaint could revolve around multiple classifications.
Complaints and grievances are assigned a severity rating by the Ombudsman who investigates them. Categorization by topic is useful, albeit not fully standardized in national practice despite existing frameworks. But a topic approach misses an opportunity to focus attention on the harm caused as a result of the concern, to elevate patient complaints on par with safety events, and to allow for allocation of resources and process. The Severity Scale was created in 2017 by our team to rate the harm of patient grievances. While focusing on reducing patient dissatisfiers can generally improve practices, an urgent response to some patient concerns can actually cause harm, especially in an era of opioid crisis ( 8 ). The Severity Scale numerically classifies case issues from no actionable events to permanent serious harm or death, using a 5-point scale, and is internally applied to all of our safety events in risk management. The scale also aligns with the well-known National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) index for categorizing medication errors ( 9) and crosswalks with World Health Organization ( 10, 11) and Healthcare Performance Improvement ( 12) classifications. Table 1 presents the description, definition, and an example of each of the five levels of the Severity Scale. Monthly reports of all cases with a classification of 4 and 5 are generated and distributed to clinical risk management and safety leaders. The important connection between patient complaints and safety improvement is well-respected through this process ( 13 ).
The Ombudsman Office at a large academic medical center created a standardized approach to manage and measure unsolicited patient complaints, including methods to identify longitudinal improvements, accounting for volume variances, as well as incident severity to prioritize response needs. Data on patient complaints and grievances are collected and categorized by type of issue, unit location, severity, and individual employee involved. In addition to granular data, results are collated into meaningful monthly leadership reports to identify opportunities for improvement. An overall benchmark for improvement is also applied based on the number of complaints and grievances received for every 1000 patient encounters. Results are utilized in conjunction with satisfaction survey results to drive patient experience strategies. By applying benchmarks to patient grievances, targets can be created based on historical performance. The utilization of grievance and complaint benchmarking helps prioritize resources to improve patient experiences.
Furthermore, effective management of complaints and grievances contributes to our medical center’s overall patient experience approach, which focuses on teamwork, empathy, safety, and ease ( 5 ). Complaints and grievances are routinely collected by health care systems and are utilized to reduce patient concerns, improve experience, and may also save organizations money from a reduction in lawsuits, legal fees, and insurance costs ( 6 ). Studies show that an increase in patient complaints increases malpractice risk ( 6 ).
Ombudsman Office casework is audited using an internal Excel tool developed in 2015. This tool is utilized by management to ensure consistency in individual ombudsman casework and to bring standardization and reliance to data reports. The audit tool is grounded in governmental oversight body grievance criteria and patient experience service excellence standards, such as courtesy, appropriate expectation setting, apology, and timeliness ( 7 ). A case is reviewed utilizing a comparison to this tool, which serves as a checklist to standardize and verify case compliance—an effective approach in health care ( 14 ). The checklist is then provided to an ombudsman for review during audits to drive discussion of casework. Random audits are conducted by management each month.
Complaints are defined as concerns about care that can be addressed at the point of service within 12 hours. Grievances are defined as “a formal or informal written or verbal complaint that is made to the hospital by a patient, or the patient’s representative, regarding the patient’s care (when the complaint is not resolved at the time of the complaint by staff present), abuse or neglect, issues related to the hospital’s compliance with the CMS Hospital Conditions of Participation (CoPs), or a Medicare beneficiary billing complaint related to rights and limitations provided by 42 CFR 489.” As the grievances process is defined in CoPs regulations, they must be responded to in writing to patients, in most cases resolved within 7 days, and are reviewed during unannounced surveys to ensure a thorough investigation occurred ( 7 ). These data are categorized by type of issue (s) that occurred in the patient encounter, such as lack of communication, long wait times, rude behavior, or any other issue the patient experienced. This process allows for the specificity of a targeted survey, while also bringing in the details of the patient’s story for more complete and accurate feedback. In our health care system, ombudsman reports are distributed monthly to hospital leadership and include categories of issues, institute and department-level data, provider type, most frequent grievances and compliments by provider, trending performance, and detailed narratives. Ombudsman report categories are as follows:
When the chief complaint is a sign or symptom communicated by the patient, the physician, based on the documentation guidelines , is supposed to ask questions to get a complete description and chronological account of the problem to be treated. According to CMS, the history of present illness (HPI) must be documented by the physician, and cannot be documented by the ancillary staff.
A chief complaint is a statement, typically in the patient’s own words: “my knee hurts,” for example, or “I have chest pain.”.
The description of the HPI is in both the 1995 and 1997 guidelines. There are eight HPI components: Location: The anatomical place, position, or site of the CC (back pain, sore neck, cut on leg, etc.)
Auditors are bound by the documentation rules, and physicians need to be aware that those rules are for the protection of the patient in the completeness of the record – but also to assist the physician as a prompt during the encounter with the patient.
According to CMS, the history of present illness (HPI) must be documented by the physician, and cannot be documented by the ancillary staff. As an auditor, I see this being documented by the medical assistant often, and that is not appropriate.
As I discussed in the first portion of our series on physician documentation issues during an audit, errors can occur on both sides, physician documentation and coding – even with proactive clinical documentation improvement (CDI) departments correcting negative behaviors and coders trying to educate physicians and mid-level providers on what is needed to support a particular level of service .
Another reason to report all secondary diagnosis, history and status codes is to confirm medical necessity. Some payors will deny tests done outpatient if the medical necessity is not met. Many times medical necessity is determined by the ICD-10-CM codes reported on the outpatient claim. For example, if an EKG is done on a patient in an encounter for outpatient fracture repair, and the chronic atrial fibrillation is not coded as a secondary diagnosis by the coder, the EKG charge/reimbursement could be denied by the payor. There are also many other examples, such as a patient getting extended laboratory tests because they are on long term anticoagulants such as Coumadin. It is very important that all secondary diagnosis/status/history codes be reported on the outpatient claim.
If secondary diagnoses are not reported, then HCC’s are not captured for the claim. This may impact reimbursement and quality measure statistics. Below are several websites that are available and that go into great detail about what HCC’s are, how they are calculated, and why they are important.
All outpatient orders should be reviewed to determine if additional signs, symptoms or diagnoses are provided. Coders may report confirmed diagnoses on radiology and pathology reports (except for incidental findings) “Z” codes help paint the entire health picture for the patient.
HCC coding is designed to estimate future health care costs for patients. Insurance companies assign the patient a risk adjustment factor (RAF) score. This score is used to predict costs for that patient. The HCC’s help explain the complexity of the patient and paints a whole picture of the patient and their illnesses. If secondary diagnoses are not reported, then HCC’s are not captured for the claim. This may impact reimbursement and quality measure statistics. Below are several websites that are available and that go into great detail about what HCC’s are, how they are calculated, and why they are important.
The final impression by the physician is COPD exacerbation. In this case, a code for the COPD exacerbation would be reported as well as “Z” codes for personal history of pneumonia, history of smoking, and family history of lung cancer and colon cancer.
Chronic conditions should be reported on each visit when they are under treatment or are systemic medical conditions. Chronic systemic conditions should be reported even in the absence of intervention or further evaluation.
If you can’t describe what HCC’s are, it is recommended that you review some of the websites above and become familiar with these. If you know the why things are reported it is easier to remember to report them. Coders must review the entire outpatient encounter rather than only focusing on the reason for the visit.