27 hours ago · A radiologist reviews and interprets a patient's x-ray and writes a report on the findings. What is the appropriate modifier? What is the appropriate modifier? Multiple Choice 74 TC 26 Correct 59 >> Go To The Portal
When you go in for a scan (whether it’s an MRI, an X-ray, computed tomography, or any other imaging modality), technologists obtain the images. When the images are complete, a radiologist examines, or “reads,” them, and writes a report indicating clinically significant details.
Full Answer
Radiologist Concerns The concern that patients wouldn’t be able to understand the reports hasn’t seemed to come true either. Thanks to the Internet, Berlin says, many patients do their own research, and “it isn’t long before they know more about their disease or condition than the doctor does.
In order to achieve clear communication, the radiologist should be aware of the intended reader of the report and how that reader will understand what is written. Most often, the reader of the radiology report is the individual responsible for providing direct patient care. In some cases, the reader will be the patient.
Interpreting Radiologist – the name of the radiologist who read the diagnostic imaging exam and wrote the report. Clinical History – describes the patient’s symptoms or existing diagnosis.
Based on this research, Johnson believes patients are more resourceful than some radiologists believe. She thinks most patients would be able to handle whatever information they discovered by reading their radiology reports on their own.
In this section, the radiologist summarizes the findings. The section lists your clinical history, symptoms, and reason for the exam. It will also give a diagnosis to explain what may be causing your problem. This section offers the most important information for decision-making. Therefore, it is the most important part of the radiology report for you and your doctor.
Comparison. Sometimes, the radiologist will compare the new imaging exam with any available previous exams. If so, the doctor will list them here. Comparisons usually involve exams of the same body area and exam type. Example: Comparison is made to a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis performed August 24, 2013.
Sometimes an exam covers an area of the body but does not discuss any findings. This usually means that the radiologist looked but did not find any problems to tell your doctor.
biopsy. combining the finding with clinical symptoms or laboratory test results. comparing the finding with prior imaging studies not available when your radiologist looked at your images. For a potentially abnormal finding, the radiologist may make any of the above recommendations.
A radiologist is a doctor who supervises these exams, reads and interprets the images, and writes a report for your doctor. This report may contain complex words and information. If you have any questions, be sure to talk to your doctor ...
More exams may be necessary to follow-up on a suspicious or questionable finding. Example: No findings on the current CT to account for the patient's clinical complaint of abdominal pain.
RECOMMENDATION: Given the patient's personal history of breast cancer, an MRI of the liver is recommended to better characterize the indeterminate liver lesion to exclude the possibility of metastases (or cancer spread).
Part of the problem with radiology reports arises because we do not really understand how important this document has become to the non-radiologist caregiver. 4 This lapse is more understandable when you realize that most major radiology textbooks do not address the subject of report composition. This would be equivalent to a journalism textbook without a chapter on how to write an article. But journalism and radiology have a lot in common. Both professions require spending a great deal of time gathering "facts" and "data" and then reporting that material in written form for a reader.
The report is the written communication of the radiologist's interpretation, discussion, and conclusion s about the radiologic study. The written report is frequently the only source of communication of these results. The report should communicate relevant information about diagnosis, condition, response to therapy, and/or results of a procedure performed. 12
The scientific report format is a practical choice for the radiology report. 11 This format is used by major scientific journals, is familiar to most physicians, and follows the general outline recommended by the American College of Radiology (ACR). 12 It also supports the notion that the radiologic study is a "scientific test." Table 2 presents a side-by-side comparison of the scientific report format and a corresponding radiology report format.
One of the 3 most common reasons for malpractice suits against radiologists is failure to communicate results clearly and effectively. 2,3 Poor communication is a common reason patients choose to sue the doctor. 5,6 In some situations, such as mammograms, it is helpful to give a copy of the report directly to the patient, which makes it even more important that the report is clear and understandable. 6,7 If a report is written so that a patient can understand what is said, it is much more likely that a healthcare provider, who depends upon the report to make decisions concerning patient management, will also understand the report. 8
Therefore, recapitulation of the indication for the study at the time of the report dictation is appropriate because it will document the actual reason the study was performed. In addition, many third-party payers and Medicare now require an appropriate indication before they will reimburse for a study.
The common practice of using a numbered list for the "Impression" section helps produce a concise summation. Numbered statements or phrases should be ordered logically to make use of implied ranking. Statements in the numbered list should maintain a parallel structure-that is, if complete sentences are used, then complete sentences should be used throughout the list, or if phrases are used, then phrases should be used throughout. For clarity, it is best to limit each numbered item to a single sentence or phrase.
For example, if the study was requested with the clinical information "cough and fever," then the report should specifically address whether or not the findings are consistent with pneumonia.
A typical radiology reports includes these sections: Name or Type of Exam. Date of Exam. Interpreting Radiologist – the name of the radiologist who read the diagnostic imaging exam and wrote the report. Clinical History – describes the patient’s symptoms or existing diagnosis.
Impression – this is the radiologist’s “impression” or diagnosis of the diagnostic imaging exam. This section includes a summary of the results and any follow up testing (like a biopsy or additional diagnostic imaging) that the radiologist recommends. ...
Reports are sent to your healthcare provider within 24 hours of your exam.
A radiologist reviews and interprets a patient's x-ray and writes a report on the findings. What is the appropriate modifier?
Dr. Farber provided only surgical care for James. Report this with modifier:
The radiology report is a crucial diagnostic tool, the considered opinion of a medical expert, and a vital part of your health records. A radiologist writes them, your doctor reads them, and they can help by creating a clearer picture of a pathology. That will ultimately improve your care.
When you go in for a scan (whether it’s an MRI, an X-ray, computed tomography, or any other imaging modality), technologists obtain the images . When the images are complete, a radiologist examines, or “reads,” them, and writes a report indicating clinically significant details. That report then gets sent out to the referring physician and, if the patient requests a copy, to the patient themselves.
This introductory section describes the imaging modality used to create the images that inform the report. It will tell readers that the patient had an MRI, an X-ray, a CT scan, or whatever the referring doctor ordered. It will mention any contrast agents used and the area of the body scanned.This section should also include the time and date of the procedure. That’s very important, because later studies can refer back to this one to see how masses within the body are moving or changing over time.
Now we’re getting somewhere. The Findings section of a radiology report will list each organ or area of the body involved in the scan. They will indicate whether those body parts look “normal” or “abnormal.”The significance of the Findings content is usually found in the next section, which brings us to…
There’s no way to write a clear, actionable analysis without resorting heavily to medical lingo, which can often look like a foreign language to lay readers. Most radiology reports follow a familiar template. Here are the sections found in the typical radiology report: Exam Type.
One of the naysayers’ biggest concerns was that patients wouldn’t be able to understand the content of the reports and could easily misinterpret the results for the worst.
By providing reports directly to patients, Berlin explains, radiologists can become more involved in their patients’ treatment decisions , as he believes they should. The days when doctors make unilateral decisions about patient care are long past, which is one reason for the change in reporting convention, he says.
But radiologists have been sued because patients weren’t told about the results of their diagnostic imaging exam, according to Berlin. “Unfortunately, there are instances where things like this can fall through the cracks,” he says. Providing patients with direct access to their reports can help eliminate this potential issue.
The radiology report is only one piece of the puzzle, and patients recognize that their doctors have the other pieces, such as medical history, symptoms, and physical exam. Their doctors are the ones who can put all the pieces together to reach a diagnosis and suggest treatment options, he says.
A session at RSNA 2012 discussed how the practice is growing —and that radiologists’ concerns about providing reports directly to patients really haven’t come true.
According to Johnson, the patients also said that if they didn’t understand the reports, they would take steps to have them translated into lay terms. Some said they would do their own research on the Internet; some said they would ask friends and family who were more knowledgeable about medical terms.
Patients seem to welcome receiving their results directly. Johnson conducted a study where she asked patients to complete hypothetical clinical simulations to see whether they wanted to have direct access to their radiology reports, even if the reports contained bad news. The study, published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology in April 2012, found that most patients wanted the reports regardless of what the radiologists found. More than 60% of those surveyed said they wanted immediate access to their radiology reports when the findings were normal. About one-half (47.2%) said they wanted immediate access if the findings were seriously abnormal, and 45% said they wanted immediate access if the findings were inconclusive.