17 hours ago Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review. Current research has demonstrated that patients' interest and ability to use patient portals is strongly influenced by personal factors such age, ethnicity, education level, health literacy, health status, and role as a caregiver. Health care delivery factors, mainly provider endorsement and patient …. >> Go To The Portal
Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review. Current research has demonstrated that patients' interest and ability to use patient portals is strongly influenced by personal factors such age, ethnicity, education level, health literacy, health status, and role as a caregiver. Health care delivery factors, mainly provider endorsement and patient ….
Feb 10, 2015 · Despite the advantages of a patient portal, there has not been widespread adoption of this patient-centered tool in the United States . Additionally, research shows that although a provider can make a patient portal available to a patient, it does not necessarily result in a healthier patient . As incentives came to a close at the end of 2014, the authors pondered if …
Apr 11, 2019 · In the outputs category, some but not all studies found patient portals improved patient engagement; patients perceived some portal functions as inadequate but others as useful; patients and staff thought portals may improve patient care but could cause anxiety in some patients; and portals improved patient safety, adherence to medications, and patient-provider …
Feb 22, 2022 · Data Bridge Market Research analyses that the patient portal market will exhibit a CAGR of around 13.84% for the forecast period of 2021-2028. Data Bridge Market Research February 22, 2022. 3 . Patient Portal Market report offers one of the best solutions to know the trends and opportunities in healthcare industry. The industry analysis report ...
This is a questionnaire designed to be completed by individuals with chronic care needs in patient homes. The tool includes questions to assess the current state of patient portals, the internet, and mobile devices.
This is a questionnaire designed to be completed by adult patients in their home. The tool includes questions to assess attitudes of non-users regarding the use of patient portals and health information technology on the internet and using mobile phones.
This is a questionnaire designed to be completed by adult patients in their home. The tool includes questions to assess attitudes of the users regarding patient portals and health information technology on the internet and using mobile phones.
Penedo FJ, Oswald LB, Kronenfeld JP, Garcia SF, Cella D, Yanez B. The increasing value of eHealth in the delivery of patient-centred cancer care. Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21 (5):e240-e251. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045 (20)30021-8. PMID: 32359500.
Ramirez-Zohfeld V, Seltzer A, Xiong L, Morse L, Lindquist LA. Use of electronic health records by older adults, 85 years and older, and their caregivers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 May;68 (5):1078-1082. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16393. Epub 2020 Mar 11. PMID: 32159860.
Fuller TE, Pong DD, Piniella N, Pardo M, Bessa N, Yoon C, Boxer RB, Schnipper JL, Dalal AK. Interactive digital health tools to engage patients and caregivers in discharge preparation: Implementation study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 28;22 (4):e15573. doi: 10.2196/15573. PMID: 32343248.
Lyles C. Engaging Diverse Patients in Using an Online Patient Portal - Final Report. (Prepared by the University of California, San Francisco under Grant No. R00 HS022408). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2019.
Widespread use of health information technology (IT) could potentially increase patients’ access to their health information and facilitate future goals of advancing patient-centered care. Despite having increased access to their health data, patients do not always understand this information or its implications, ...
There is growing interest in electronic access to health information and the use of digital data for both disease and health-related tracking. Widespread use of health information technology (IT) could potential ly increase patients’ access to their health information and facilitate future goals of advancing patient-centered care.1 For example, health IT can be used to facilitate information exchange with clinicians and instruct patients when to act upon clinical issues, such as out of range physiologic parameters, follow-up of test results, and complications of medication use. 2 Tools such as personal health records, patient portals, and various mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) have been developed to help patients engage in their own care. Already, a significant number of patients use health IT; therefore, it is essential that patient-facing health IT be tailored to their needs. In this paper, we discuss two forms of patient-facing health IT tools—patient portals and apps—to highlight how, despite several limitations of each, combining high-yield features of mHealth apps with portals could increase patient engagement and self-management and be more effective than either of them alone. This could potentially improve both patient experience and outcomes related to patient-facing health IT.
This statement accompanies the article Patient portals and health apps: Pitfalls, promises, and what one might learn from the other authored by Jessica L. Baldwin and co-authored by Hardeep Singh, Dean F. Sittig, Traber Davis Giardina and submitted to Healthcare as an Article Type. Authors collectively affirm that this manuscript represents original work that has not been published and is not being considered for publication elsewhere.We also affirm that all authors listed contributed significantly to the project and manuscript. Furthermore we confirm that none of our authors have disclosures and we declare noconflict of interest.
Patient portals are intended to engage patients by giving them access to medical information ; however, if patients are unable to understand the information or the system is not usable, patients will not take advantage of them. Despite several aforementioned drawbacks, apps have used evolving innovative designs to engage consumers and offer unique features and functions that could be translated to patient portal design. For instance, Apple's ResearchKit's Diabetes app pings the user daily to update disease and symptom-related information. Check-in questions or user-friendly alerts in portals could similarly be explored for engaging more patients their health care. Alerts could ask if the patient understands an abnormal result, direct them to helpful resources, and encourage test result follow-up. Finally, test results in the portal need to be easily understood by laypeople or displayed using simplified medical terms. For example, a portal might display elevated cholesterol as "↑LDL cholesterol," or even just display the number without a flag, whereas a health app may label it as “bad cholesterol.”
In June 2014, Apple announced the HealthKit cloud application programming interface (API) and its partnership with Epic (Verona, WI), an electronic health record vendor who also makes MyChart (a popular patient portal), and the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN).
Patient portals are secure websites where patients can view their health records, view test results, send messages to their doctor, and ask for prescription refills. Patients with chronic, or long-term, health problems such as asthma, diabetes, or heart disease must often coordinate their care across different doctors in multiple locations.
Article Highlight: Access to a patient portal can increase engagement in outpatient visits by patients with diabetes and those with multiple complex chronic conditions, according to a PCORI-funded study spotlighted recently in PLOS One. The study showed that portal use was associated with significantly fewer emergency room visits and preventable hospital stays for patients with multiple complex conditions. By increasing patient office visits, a portal could potentially help clinicians address unmet clinical needs and reduce health events that lead to emergency and hospital care. The observational study compared visit rates for 165,000 patients with and without portal access in a large healthcare system that implemented a patient portal.
Objective 1: no follow-up for study outcomes. Objective 2: 2-year follow-up for study outcomes. Patient portals are secure websites where patients can access their health records. In this study, researchers, patients, clinicians, and other health system staff collaborated to design a survey to understand the drivers of and barriers ...
Peer review of PCORI-funded research helps make sure the report presents complete, balanced, and useful information about the research . It also assesses how the project addressed PCORI’s Methodology Standards. During peer review, experts read a draft report of the research and provide comments about the report. These experts may include a scientist focused on the research topic, a specialist in research methods, a patient or caregiver, and a healthcare professional. These reviewers cannot have conflicts of interest with the study.