26 hours ago · Because many states have mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse, the therapist’s judgment is more constrained in these cases. Ensuring the health of the client is the biggest concern, which means the therapist may want to consult the client regarding how to breach confidentiality regarding abuse when it is legally obligated so as to ensure the client … >> Go To The Portal
One example necessitating that confidentiality be broken is in a case where you believe a child may be being abused. If the child has unexplained injuries and appears to be frightened of their parent or primary caregiver, that may be enough for a reasonable suspicion of abuse.
Full Answer
Such situations may arise, for example, if a patient threatens to harm others; if they have a serious communicable disease; or if they are continuing to work or drive when they are not fit to do so. The confidentiality of a patient should only be breached in exceptional circumstances and in line with GMC guidance.
Notably, many depressed clients may express suicidal thoughts. Likewise, many clients with anger issues may express violent thoughts. The fact a client has merely expressed these thoughts in the context of seeking help for them is not cause to breach confidentiality. Instead, the standard which many therapists use is the prospect of intent.
PSWP may identify patients, health care providers and individuals that report medical errors or other patient safety events. This PSWP is confidential and may only be disclosed in certain very limited situations. Anyone can file a patient safety confidentiality complaint.
When a disclosure is contemplated, each case must be considered on its own merits. In such cases, it is advisable to consult with senior colleagues, your hospital legal representative or local Caldicott guardian, or medical defence union. None declared. This article summarizes the main medico-legal issues involving patient confidentiality.
However, great care must be taken when using the media to highlight concerns over patient welfare when breaches may cause distress to patients or their relatives and result in disciplinary proceedings. To summarize, anaesthetists must be vigilant to the duty of confidentiality and the legitimate exemptions.
The general principles of what is considered confidential have been outlined in common law. A duty of confidence arises when one person discloses information to another (e.g. a patient to a doctor) in circumstances where it is reasonable to expect that the information be held in confidence. To represent a breach, confidential information must: Enforcement of a legal duty in the UK has to date been relatively weak. Both the GMC and Department of Health 3 provide ethical guidance for professionals that would nonetheless be given considerable weighting by the courts or independently lead to professional disciplinary action. There has to date been no criminal conviction of a doctor for breach of confidence, although civil claims in negligence have occurred and damages awarded ( Cornelius v Taranto [2001] 68 BMR 62) when confidence has been breached by revealing medical information without explicit consent.
Confidentiality is central to the preservation of trust between doctors and their patients. The moral basis is consequentialist, in that it is to improve patient welfare. There is a wider communitarian public interest in the protection of confidences; thus, preservation of confidentiality is necessary to secure public health.
Disclosures in the public interest. Public interest ranges from public health to prevention or detection of serious crime. This justification is more subjective and in contentious cases, the courts may be required to decide. There is a distinction between ‘in the public interest and what the public are interested in’.
Up to 40% of patients with HIV are not aware of their diagnosis on admission to intensive care. 9 Dealing with a newly diagnosed patient, when they do not have the necessary capacity to permit disclosure of the information to at-risk partners or contact tracing is legally and ethically challenging.
It is the preferred form as there is no doubt as to what has been agreed and is usually required for sharing more sensitive data. The patient must have the necessary capacity to consent, that is, understand, retain, and balance the information, and also communicate their decision.
This is the most common reason for revealing confidential details. If the patient expressly consents to disclosure, a doctor is relieved from the duty of confidence. Consent may be explicit or implied. Explicit consent requires active agreement but may be written or oral. It is the preferred form as there is no doubt as to what has been agreed and is usually required for sharing more sensitive data. The patient must have the necessary capacity to consent, that is, understand, retain, and balance the information, and also communicate their decision. This can be challenging in the critical care setting when patients are often sedated or suffering disease processes affecting their conscious level.
Making the disclosure. If it is not practicable or safe to seek consent, or if the patient refuses to give consent, and you are satisfied that information should be disclosed, the GMC says that you should act quickly. You should keep disclosures to the minimum necessary for the purpose.
The GMC says that a disclosure may be justified to protect individuals or society from the risk of serious harm, such as from serious communicable diseases or serious crime . For example if the disclosure is likely to be necessary for the prevention, detection, or prosecution of crime, especially crimes against the person.
In deciding if a disclosure is necessary in the public interest you should consider whether a failure to disclose would expose others to a risk of death or serious harm. The GMC says that “the benefits to an individual or society of the disclosure must outweigh both the patient’s and the public interest in keeping the information confidential.”.
There are also a number of laws that require doctors to disclose patient information, for purposes including the notification of infectious diseases, the prevention of terrorism, and the reporting of female genital mutilation in girls under the age of 18.
The confidentiality of a patient should only be breached in exceptional circumstances and in line with GMC guidance. Whenever you disclose personal information about a patient you must be able to justify your reasons for doing so, which may be on the following grounds:
But occasionally a patient will tell you something that makes you concerned for the safety of others. Deciding whether or not to breach confidentiality in these situations can be challenging for doctors, who are mindful of both the importance of trust in the doctor-patient relationship and their wider duty to protect the public.
Marika Davies explains the GMC’s updated guidance on confidentiality. Patients often confide in their doctors, and can usually do so safe in the knowledge that what they disclose will only be shared with those directly involved in their care. But occasionally a patient will tell you something that makes you concerned for the safety of others.
If you believe that a person or organization shared PSWP, you may file a complaint with OCR. Your complaint must: Name the person that is the subject of the complaint and describe the act or acts believed to be in violation of the Patient Safety Act requirement to keep PSWP confidential.
OCR enforces the confidentiality provisions of the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005 (Patient Safety Act) and the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Rule (Patient Safety Rule). Together, the Patient Safety Act and Rule establish a voluntary system for Patient Safety Organizations ...
Assembled or developed by a health care provider for reporting to a Patient Safety Organization (PSO) that is listed by the HHS Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and is documented as being within the provider’s patient safety evaluation system for reporting to a PSO. Developed by a PSO for the conduct of patient safety activities.
PSWP may identify patients, health care providers and individuals that report medical errors or other patient safety events. This PSWP is confidential and may only be disclosed in certain very limited situations.
A leading cause of malpractice lawsuits is poor interpersonal relationships between patients and health care providers. true. It is illegal for the physician who signs a patient's death certificate to participate in any activities that involve removing organs from a deceased patient for transplant in another patient. true.
Written instructions are prepared by the patient to be followed if she becomes unable to make health care decisions. advance directive. A document in which a patient designates a specific person to act on her behalf if she becomes unable to make health care decisions. durable power of attorney for health care.
breach of contract. A person, such as an employee, who acts on behalf of another. agent. It is not recommended that a patient be told that he will soon be "as good as new" after suffering a serious heart attack, because the statement may be interpreted as an enforceable.
It is legal to take organs after a patient's death, without his prior permission or that of his family, if there are patients in the same facility waiting for transplants. As long as a patient gives permission for a procedure, the health care professional is guaranteed protection from charges of battery.
However, Part 2 also requires a consent form to specify the kind and amount of information that can be disclosed to each of the recipients named in the consent.
Part 2 permits the disclosure of information under certain circumstances without consent during a medical emergency or in other limited situations. If a Part 2 program (or a healthcare provider that has received Part 2 patient information) believes that there is an immediate threat to the health or safety of any individual, there are steps described below that the Part 2 program or healthcare provider can take in such a situation:
Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) is a cluster of activities designed to identify people who engage in risky substance use or who might meet the criteria for a formal substance use disorder. Clinical findings indicate that the overwhelming majority of individuals screened in a general medical setting do not have a substance use disorder and do not need substance use disorder treatment.
To promote compliance, SAMHSA recommends that the notification include all the information that the Part 2 program is required to document in the patient’s records (e.g., date and time of disclosure, the nature of the emergency, etc.).
While oral revocations must be honored under Part 2, SAMHSA recommends the entity obtaining the revocation get it in writing and/or document the revocation in the patient’s record. Part 2 prohibits a program from making a disclosure on the basis of a consent which it knows has been revoked.
A QSOA is a two-way agreement between a Part 2 program and the entity providing the service, in this case the provider of on-call coverage.
Yes, as long the consent form signed conforms to the requirements of Part 2. (See previously issued FAQ Number 11 published by SAMHSA and ONC in 2010 for a list of the required elements of a patient consent under Part 2: Applying the Substance Abuse Confidentiality Regulations to Health Information Exchange (HIE) (PDF | 381 KB). A QSOA does not allow a QSO such as an HIO to redisclose Part 2 information to a third party, except to a contract agent of the HIO if it needs to do so in order to provide the service (s) described in the QSO. However, if a patient signs a consent form authorizing the HIO, which has received the disclosed information from the Part 2 program, to redisclose the Part 2 information to a HIO affiliated member, then the Part 2 information can be redisclosed by the HIO.
While Doe was waiting for his treatment, the nurse texted her sister-in-law and told her Doe was being treated for the STD. The manner in which she texted this information led the sister-in-law to believe the staff was making fun of his diagnosis and treatment. The sister-in-law immediately forwarded the messages to Doe.
60185: Advanced Practice Nurse Pharmacology#N#(25 contact hours)#N#Written and rigorously peer reviewed by pharmacists and advanced practice nurses, this course features a wide range of medical conditions and the medications associated with them. Chapter topics include hypertension, diuretics, GI, critical care, sexually transmitted diseases, asthma, oncology, non-opioid analgesics, diabetes, weight loss, mental health conditions and more. APN tips are featured throughout the chapters to help clinicians in their prescribing practices. This course will help APNs meet the new ANCC 25-contact hour pharmacology requirement for recertification.
What this case underscores about patient confidentiality is that there can be liability for a facility for its own duties to protect a patient’s medical information.
A letter was sent to Doe from the president and CEO of the facility informing Doe that an unauthorized disclosure of his confidential health information did occur, appropriate disciplinary action had been taken and steps put into place to prevent such a breach from happening in the future.
It is difficult to track the scope of trafficking because of the underground or hidden nature of activities. Most victims in the U.S. are unwilling participants in the sex trade.
Apparently Doe did not name the nurse in his lawsuit but elected to sue only the facilities that either owned or provided staff and other support to the facility. Perhaps Doe thought this was how he could obtain the largest amount of a monetary award. If so, the decision was unwise at best.
Our legal information columnist Nancy J. Brent, MS, JD, RN, received her Juris Doctor from Loyola University Chicago School of Law and concentrates her solo law practice in health law and legal representation, consultation and education for healthcare professionals, school of nursing faculty and healthcare delivery facilities. Brent has conducted many seminars on legal issues in nursing and healthcare delivery across the country and has published extensively in the area of law and nursing practice. She brings more than 30 years of experience to her role of legal information columnist. Her posts are designed for educational purposes only and are not to be taken as specific legal or other advice. Individuals who need advice on a specific incident or work situation should contact a nurse attorney or attorney in their state. Visit The American Association of Nurse Attorneys website to search its attorney referral database by state.
As mandated, they are trained to identify signs and symptoms of abuse or neglect and are required by law to report their findings. Failure to do so may result in discipline by the board of nursing, discipline by their employer, and possible legal action taken against them. If a nurse suspects abuse or neglect, they should first report it ...
Nurses should provide a calm, comforting environment and approach the patient with care and concern. A complete head-to-toe examination should take place, looking for physical signs of abuse. A chaperone or witness should be present if possible as well.
Amanda Bucceri Androus is a Registered Nurse from Sacramento, California. She graduated from California State University, Sacramento in 2000 with a bachelor's degree in nursing. She began her career working night shifts on a pediatric/ med-surg unit for six years, later transferring to a telemetry unit where she worked for four more years. She currently works as a charge nurse in a busy outpatient primary care department. In her spare time she likes to read, travel, write, and spend time with her husband and two children.
While not required by law, nurses should also offer to connect victims of abuse to counseling services. Many times, victims fall into a cycle of abuse which is difficult to escape.
Employers are typically clear with outlining requirements for their workers, but nurses have a responsibility to know what to do in case they care for a victim of abuse.
The nurse should notify law enforcement as soon as possible, while the victim is still in the care area. However, this depends on the victim and type of abuse. Adults who are alert and oriented and capable of their decision-making can choose not to report on their own and opt to leave. Depending on the state, nurses may be required ...