14 hours ago 9 rows · HIV Surveillance. The listed documents provide guidance about the surveillance case definition for HIV infection and reporting criteria for HIV infection and perinatal exposure to HIV infection. This guidance is intended for clinicians who diagnose persons with HIV infection, laboratories, HIV surveillance programs, and health department staff. >> Go To The Portal
Separate written consent for HIV testing is not recommended. General informed consent for medical care that notifies the patient that an HIV test will be performed unless the patient declines (opt-out screening) should be considered sufficient to encompass informed consent for HIV testing.
Separate written consent for HIV testing is not recommended. General informed consent for medical care that notifies the patient that an HIV test will be performed unless the patient declines (opt-out screening) should be considered sufficient to encompass informed consent for HIV testing.
An HIV counselor can be designated by the physician who ordered the test to complete and submit the report form, but the form must be signed by the physician. Non-clinical staff do not report. How about social workers? Psychologists? And other licensed professionals?
Virtual Mentor. 2005;7 (10):687-692. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.10.hlaw1-0510. HIV status and reporting requirements raise legal issues related to patient confidentiality. Legal protection of patient privacy and confidentiality depends on whether or not public health concerns outweigh the interest in preserving the doctor-patient privilege.
Concern relates to possible reluctance to be HIV tested by source patients who will be informed that a positive HIV test must be reported to the DOH. The regulations do not provide any exceptions to HIV reporting in the case of an occupational bloodborne pathogen exposure.
HIV and STD Criminalization Laws 2021 In 12 states, laws require people with HIV who are aware of their status to disclose their status to sex partners, and 4 states require disclosure to needle-sharing partners. The maximum sentence length for violating an HIV-specific statute is also a matter of state law.
The American Medical Association has issued guidance that HIV-infected practitioners undertaking exposure-prone procedures must either disclose this to their patients, obtaining their informed consent prior to treatment or must withdraw from treatment.
Doctors generally need a patient's written consent to disclose HIV-related information to employers and others requiring medical forms. These consent requirements are in HIPAA and many state laws, including New York's.
Informed consent for testing means that the person being tested understands HIV testing procedures, the reasons for testing and is able to assess the personal implications of testing before deciding whether to be tested.
Informed consent is required for any investigation or treatment proposed to a patient. Understanding of the nature of procedure, benefits and risks are the cornerstones of informed consent. While autonomy is one of the four main ethical principles, I argue that there is no absolute right to autonomy or consent.
Consent represents the ethical and legal expression of a person's right to have their autonomy and self-determination respected.
What if a known source person refuses to be tested? The rules state that a source person may be tested with or without consent, so long as the test can be done with safety to the source person and the health care provider. In practice, providers should proceed with care if a source person refuses.
This HIV Policy Resource Bank category includes materials focusing primarily on federal and state proposals related to the streamlining of the HIV testing process, from more patient-tailored pre-test and post-test counseling to the elimination of informed, documented consent. Also included are resources on the effectiveness of voluntary HIV counseling and testing approaches; the importance of voluntariness and autonomy in health care decision-making for marginalized populations, particularly people of color, immigrants, and non-native English speakers; and the role of HIV testing as a gateway to comprehensive HIV health care and support services.
Informed consent is characterized by a process of communication between a patient and physician that results in the patient's authorization or agreement to undergo a specific medical intervention.
In the United States, HIV testing is governed by a range of federal and state laws, common law principles, constitutional provisions, and various codes of ethics. State laws vary widely in the degree of protection provided. The concept of informed consent, achieved through the process of physician-patient ...
Before being asked to consent to HIV testing, patients must receive the points of information about HIV required by the NYS Public Health Law , Article 27F. This information can be given to patients orally, in writing, electronically or can be delivered in a group set-up (i.e. a poster in a waiting room):
The general medical consent form must give the patient an opportunity to refuse HIV testing (that is, an opportunity to opt out of being tested for HIV). For examples of acceptable language and model forms, see below or visit New York State Department of Health.
By law, health care providers must offer an HIV test to all patients aged 13-64.
If you test positive, you can get treatment for HIV/AIDS to help you stay healthy and live longer. HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, can be spread through unprotected sex, sharing needles, childbirth or by breastfeeding. People living with HIV/AIDS can use safe practices to protect others from becoming infected.
Providers or agencies unable to use documented oral or general medical consent can use HIV testing consent forms created by The New York State Health Department in multiple languages. For copies of these forms, visit New York State Department of Health.
Documented oral consent. Written consent is no longer required, except in correctional facilities. Providers must document oral notification in the patient’s medical record. In non-medical settings, note the conversation in the program’s testing documentation for each client.
People living with HIV/AIDS can use safe practices to protect others from becoming infected. See What You Need to Know About an HIV Test (PDF): A brochure you can give your patients that covers all required pre-test information.
Some states also have laws that require clinic staff to notify a “third party” if they know that person has a significant risk for exposure to HIV from a patient the staff member knows is infected with HIV. This is called “duty to warn.”.
The Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program requires that health departments receiving money from the Ryan White program show “good faith” efforts to notify the marriage partners of a patient with HIV.
If your HIV test is positive, the clinic or other testing site will report the results to your state health department. They do this so that public health officials can monitor what’s happening with the HIV epidemic in your city and state. (It’s important for them to know this, because Federal and state funding for HIV services is often targeted ...
Your state health department will then remove all of your personal information (name, address, etc.) from your test results and send the information to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC is the Federal agency responsible for tracking national public health trends.
Any individual who believes that his or her employment rights have been violated may file a charge of discrimination with the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). In addition, an individual, an organization, or an agency may file a charge on behalf of another person in order to protect the aggrieved person's identity.
Many states and some cities have partner-notification laws—meaning that, if you test positive for HIV, you (or your healthcare provider) may be legally obligated to tell your sex or needle-sharing partner (s).
In some states, if you are HIV-positive and don’t tell your partner (s), you can be charged with a crime. Some health departments require healthcare providers to report the name of your sex and needle-sharing partner (s) if they know that information–even if you refuse to report that information yourself. Some states also have laws that require ...
In 2006, CDC published its Revised Recommendations for HIV Testing of Adults, Adolescents, and Pregnant Women in Health-Care Settings . These recommendations support routine testing and differ from previous recommendations in ways that impacted state laws addressing HIV testing procedures in regards to informed consent and pre-test counseling. Specifically, these recommendations stated that: 1 Separate written consent for HIV testing is not recommended. General informed consent for medical care that notifies the patient that an HIV test will be performed unless the patient declines (opt-out screening) should be considered sufficient to encompass informed consent for HIV testing. 2 Prevention counseling—defined as an interactive process of assessing risk of infection, recognizing specific behaviors that increase this risk, and developing a plan to reduce risk—should not be required with HIV diagnostic testing or as part of HIV screening programs in health-care settings.
General informed consent for medical care that notifies the patient that an HIV test will be performed unless the patient declines (opt-out screening) should be considered sufficient to encompass informed consent for HIV testing.
In 2006, CDC published its Revised Recommendations for HIV Testing of Adults, Adolescents, and Pregnant Women in Health-Care Settings . These recommendations support routine testing and differ from previous recommendations in ways that impacted state laws addressing HIV testing procedures in regards to informed consent and pre-test counseling.
Testing that occurs as part of an individual’s routine healthcare visit is especially important because it creates the opportunity to diagnose infections in people who may not consider themselves at risk for HIV.
Currently, all but two states, Nebraska and New York, have laws that are consistent with CDC recommendations ( click here to find out about specific states ).
Prevention counseling—defined as an interactive process of assessing risk of infection, recognizing specific behaviors that increase this risk, and developing a plan to reduce risk—should not be required with HIV diagnostic testing or as part of HIV screening programs in health-care settings.
What are the rights and responsibilities of health insurance plans with regard to HIV reporting? The new law requires diagnostic medical providers and laboratories to report HIV, HIV-related illness and AIDS. Medical providers, not health insurance plans, practice medicine. Consequently, insurance plans have no responsibility to report.
How will HIV infected inmates access PN assistance services in state prisons? All inmates found to be HIV infected will be offered access to PN assistance services. This access will be offered whether the inmate tested with DOCS Medical Services, the AIDS Institute Counseling and Testing Program, or with a community-based organization that is part of the Criminal Justice Initiative sponsored by the AIDS Institute.
What is the penalty for misuse of HIV information possessed by insurance companies? Violation of Public Health Law (PHL) Article 27-F may result in a $5,000 fine and possible one year in prison, but only certain parts of Article 27-F cover insurance companies (see PHL 2784). The insurance law governs insurers, except for health maintenance organizations (HMOs) which are explicitly governed by PHL Article 27-F.
Please explain how the carbonless copy report form will work. It is a two-part form. The top sheet, which is the provider's copy, contains all the labels on the boxes and lines that need to be filled in. As the provider fills in the top sheet of the form, the information is transferred to the bottom sheet. The bottom sheet, which is sent to the Department of Health, contains only the boxes and lines but no labels or any reference to HIV or AIDS.
The regulations define a contact as a spouse or sexual contact, a needle sharing partner, or a person who may have been exposed to HIV in defined occupational settings under circumstances that present a risk of transmission. Depending on the circumstances of exposure, a correctional worker could be a contact.
For the purpose of this legislation, HIV infection is defined as infection with the human immunodeficiency viruses that are the cause of AIDS or as the term may be defined from time to time by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States Public Health Service.
Why is the determination of risk of domestic violence (DV) falling solely in the hands of the public health staff? The determination of risk of DV should be made by the medical provider ( or his/her designee) providing the HIV post-test counseling and DV screening. Public health staff will rely on the determination of risk of DV made by the medical provider, based on the DV screening conducted with the client. Public health staff will conduct the DV screen before proceeding with PN if the provider has not conducted the screening. The regulations require the responsible public health official to consider whether or not partner notification should proceed. The public health officer will make such decisions in consultation with the responsible physician, and when possible, with the infected individual and the domestic violence service provider (when a signed release is present). This decision involves balancing the potential risks of domestic violence with the benefits of partner notification.
Partner Services specialists are required to discuss intimate partner (s) and domestic violence risks and concerns during the informed consent process for HIV testing. If HIV-positive, the Partner Services Specialist will review partner notification options when providing the test result for each partner elicited.
Adopted Children When a child has been adopted, the adoptive parents assume all parental rights; therefore, they, not the biological parents, have legal authority to consent to health care for and HIV testing for the adopted infant or young child.
A medical provider ordering the test must conduct an individualized assessment of every older child's or adolescent's actual ability to understand the nature and consequences of being tested for HIV and to make informed decisions about whether to be tested.
Screening for risk of domestic violence will take place on a partner-by-partner basis as partner names and other locating information are elicited. This will provide the young person with an opportunity to express concerns about the potential for violence related to notifying a specific partner, including another minor, an adult, a parent or another relative. Domestic violence screening of minors related to HIV partner services needs to incorporate assessments of potential domestic violence from family members related to partner notification, as well as sexual and/or needle sharing partners. Potential for homelessness needs to be a component of the screening process.
Partner Services notify minors on a regular/frequent basis, primarily for gonorrhea and chlamydia.
Infants and very Young Children Infants and very young children do not have the capacity to consent because they do not yet have the ability to understand or make informed decisions about the test. The person authorized pursuant to law to consent to health care for the child has the right to decide whether the child may be tested and to consent on behalf of the child. In intact families, the biological parents generally have the legal authority to consent. Pre-test counseling must be provided and the consent form must be signed by one or both parents.
No, HIV and STD partner notifications do not include telling the parents. Partner notification services are confidential; therefore, no parental notification occurs when a minor receives services unless the minor specifically requests that his/her parents be involved or contacted.
Public policy encourages high-risk groups to submit to HIV testing because those individuals who know they are HIV-positive are more likely to seek treatment and take precautions that may prevent transmission of the virus.
Laws to determine the boundaries of liability and reporting in HIV and AIDS will have to be developed because, clearly, there are conflicting legal doctrines at work in the mandatory reporting case law that judges have made.
Partner notification is critical so that individuals know they are at risk, receive HIV counseling and testing, and get appropriate medical care. One of the most controversial issues is whether physicians may disclose the HIV status of their patients to known contacts and, further, whether failure to do so may give rise to liability if the known contact becomes HIV-positive. Though the threat of the contact is clear and immediate, individuals may be discouraged from undergoing testing if they know someone will notify contacts.
Legal protection of patient privacy and confidentiality depends on whether or not public health concerns outweigh the interest in preserving the doctor-patient privilege. The balancing of these interests is a particular challenge when it comes to privacy concerns associated with HIV status. A core legal dilemma in the case ...
A core legal dilemma in the case of HIV/AIDS is determining when the need to protect others, such as sex partners to whom the patient is likely to transmit HIV, supersedes the patient's right to confidentiality .
If a physician knows that a seropositive individual is endangering a third party, the physician should, within the con straints of the law (1) attempt to persuade the infected patient to cease endangering the third party; (2) if persuasion fails, notify authorities; and (3) if the authorities take no action, notify the endangered third party [16].
The tension between reporting and confidentiality in HIV and AIDS cases is difficult for physicians. Although the ends of the spectrum may provide for relatively clear action—such as when an infected patient is known to engage in unsafe sexual practices without disclosure—the discussion of HIV disclosure is a difficult issue. Patients may be debilitated and physically vulnerable and may be subject to significant insurance and social discrimination if HIV status is wrongfully disclosed.
Texas Health and Safety Code Section 81.109 requires that persons receiving a positive HIV test result be given the opportunity for immediate, face-to-face counseling about several aspects of the test.
Texas law requires physicians or others permitted by law to attend a woman during pregnancy or delivery to test her for HIV, syphilis and hepatitis B (Texas Health and Safety Code Section 81.090). She must be tested for HIV and syphilis at her first prenatal visit and during the third trimester. If no record of third trimester test results are available, expedited tests for HIV and syphilis must be conducted at delivery.
State laws that cover the confidentiality of HIV test results include Texas Health and Safety Code Sections 81.046, 81.103, and 81.106(b). Health care providers should also be knowledgeable regarding federal HIPAA requirements.
This means that the minor has the cognitive ability to understand the risks and benefits involved.