iom report to measure patient safety and quality of care

by Mrs. Lois Abernathy Jr. 3 min read

IOM report: patient safety--achieving a new standard for …

30 hours ago IOM report: patient safety--achieving a new standard for care. IOM report: patient safety--achieving a new standard for care Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;12(10):1011-2. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.010. Author Institute of Medicine. PMID: 16204148 ... Quality Assurance, Health Care / standards >> Go To The Portal


Does the IOM report have an impact on patient safety?

Although the report has been widely credited with spawning efforts to study and improve safety in health care, there has been limited objective assessment of its impact. We evaluated the effects of the IOM report on patient safety publications and research awards.

Does the release of the IOM report influence the publication rate?

The rate of patient safety publications increased from 59 to 164 articles per 100 000 MEDLINE publications (p<0.001) following the release of the IOM report. Increased rates of publication were observed for all types of patient safety articles.

What do we know about existing measures of quality of care?

Existing measures address some domains more extensively than others. The vast majority of measures address effectiveness and safety, a smaller number examine timeliness and patient-centeredness, and very few assess the efficiency or equity of care. [2]

How is patient safety measured in healthcare settings?

However, measurement of patient safety is complex, and, while several different methods may be used, there is no single validated method for measuring the overall safety of care provided in a given health care setting.

image

WHAT IS THE IOM quality report?

The IOM describes evidence-based practice as the integration of research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values in making decisions about the care of individual patients. Each of these sources may be contributing factors relevant to decision making regarding patient care.

What is the 2000 IOM report?

Tracking The Changing Safety Net The 2000 IOM report found that the federal government lacked any comprehensive, coordinated ability to track and monitor the changing status of America's health care safety net and its success in meeting the needs of our most vulnerable populations.

What are the six IOM quality domains?

One of the most commonly used frameworks comes from the Institute of Medicine (IOM), which has articulated six aims of health care that many consider to be domains of quality, broadly defined. The IOM says health care should be safe, effective, timely, patient-centered, efficient and equitable.

What did the IOM errors report show?

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) released a report in 1999 entitled “To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System”. The report stated that errors cause between 44 000 and 98 000 deaths every year in American hospitals, and over one million injuries.

What is the IOM report To Err is Human?

On November 29, 1999, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released a report called To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. The IOM released the report before the intended date because it had been leaked, and one of the major news networks was planning to run a story on the evening news.

What did the IOM report To Err is Human find as contributors to medical errors?

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) released their landmark report, To Err Is Human, in 1999 and reported that as many as 98,000 people die in hospitals every year as a result of preventable medical errors.

What does IOM mean in health care?

Institute of MedicineInstitute of Medicine (IOM).

How does the IOM report affect nursing?

The report emphasizes development of leadership programs that harness nurses' capacity to lead change, and advance health and health care by creating innovative opportunities for education and professional growth.

What is patient-centered care IOM?

The Institute of Medicine or IOM (renamed the National Academy of Medicine in 2015) defines patient-centered as: “Providing care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions.”

What has been the historical importance of the Institute of Medicine IOM reports since 1999?

What has been the historical importance of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) reports since 1999? 1. They stimulated the development of strategies that will improve quality of care.

Which was the purpose of the Institute of Medicine IOM report on preventing medication errors?

The report was commissioned by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services at the direction of Congress and released on 20 July. It found that drug related errors are the most common medical errors and can occur at every stage from prescription through to monitoring the patient's response.

What is the role of the Institute of Medicine?

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) is an independent, nonprofit organization that works outside of government to provide unbiased and authoritative advice to decision makers and the public.

Why are IOM domains important?

Frameworks like the IOM domains also make it easier for consumers to grasp the meaning and relevance of quality measures. Studies have shown that providing consumers with a framework for understanding quality helps them value a broader range of quality indicators. For example, when consumers are given a brief, understandable explanation of safe, ...

What are the six aims of the health care system?

[1] Safe: Avoiding harm to patients from the care that is intended to help them. Effective: Providing services based on scientific knowledge to all who could benefit ...

Why is measurement important?

Measurement is used for a variety of purposes: to evaluate the effectiveness of safety interventions, identify new or emerging safety threats, compare safety across hospitals and clinics, or to determine whether patient safety is improving over time. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to measurement—the choice of metric varies depending on ...

Is there a one size fits all approach to measurement?

There is no one-size-fits-all approach to measurement—the choice of metric varies depending on the purpose of measurement. For example, studies of missed nursing care measure processes—the frequency with which required care elements are not completed.

Is there a validated method for measuring the overall safety of care provided in a given health care setting?

However, measurement of patient safety is complex, and, while several different methods may be used, there is no single validated method for measuring the overall safety of care provided in a given health care setting.

What is health IT?

Health IT, when well designed and implemented, is a tool that can help health information flow in ways that allow for improvements in patient health and safety. Whatever the drawbacks to health IT systems, the evidence suggests that health IT has raised the floor on safety.

Does health IT improve patient safety?

Since then, whether health IT actually improves patient safety has remained an open question. The nation has seen widespread adoption of health IT as a result of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs. With that increase in adoption, there should be more and better evidence on the actual impact of health IT on safety.

What are the practices considered to have sufficient evidence to include in the category of patient safety practices?

Practices considered to have sufficient evidence to include in the category of patient safety practices are as follows:12. Appropriate use of prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients at risk. Use of perioperative beta-blockers in appropriate patients to prevent perioperative morbidity and mortality.

What is the most important contribution of nursing to patient safety?

The most critical contribution of nursing to patient safety, in any setting, is the ability to coordinate and integrate the multiple aspects of quality within the care directly provided by nursing, and across the care delivered by others in the setting.

What is the cornerstone of high quality health care?

Conclusion. Patient safety is the cornerstone of high-quality health care. Much of the work defining patient safety and practices that prevent harm have focused on negative outcomes of care, such as mortality and morbidity. Nurses are critical to the surveillance and coordination that reduce such adverse outcomes.

What are the types of errors and harm?

The types of errors and harm are further classified regarding domain, or where they occurred across the spectrum of health care providers and settings. The root causes of harm are identified in the following terms:8 1 Latent failure—removed from the practitioner and involving decisions that affect the organizational policies, procedures, allocation of resources 2 Active failure—direct contact with the patient 3 Organizational system failure—indirect failures involving management, organizational culture, protocols/processes, transfer of knowledge, and external factors 4 Technical failure—indirect failure of facilities or external resources

When was the IOM report released?

Setting a Direction. In early 2000, just 60 days after the IOM report was published, the Federal Government, through an AHRQ-led task force, released Doing What Counts for Patient Safety: Federal Actions to Reduce Medical Errors and Their Impact.

What is the Patient Safety and Quality Handbook?

Given the central role that nurses serve in patient care and the likelihood that they are among the first health care professionals to recognize errors and prevent harm to patients, the Agency teamed with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to develop and distribute a handbook for nurses entitled Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Even though working conditions may be less than optimal and the needs of patients are quite diverse, the opportunities for patient safety and quality improvement are clearly addressed. More than 22,000 copies of the three-volume handbook have been distributed to nursing schools and clinicians in the field.

What is the AHRQ tool?

To help organizations understand and quantify patient safety events and areas of vulnerability in their institutions, AHRQ developed a useful measuring and monitoring tool: the Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs). The tool includes 20 hospital-level and 7 regional measures. By using hospital administrative data, PSIs can identify pressure ulcers, postoperative pulmonary emboli, accidental punctures and lacerations, and many other departures from safe care that are preventable. AHRQ continues to make the PSIs available as a free software program and uses PSIs regularly in its annual National Healthcare Quality Report and National Healthcare Disparities Report.

What is AHRQ Advances in Patient Safety?

AHRQ released Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation as a way to share the progress occurring in the first half of the decade. The four-volume publication, comprising 140 articles, sought to bridge the gap between the research underway and its integration into practice. The compendium covered a wide range of research paradigms, clinical settings, patient populations, reporting systems, measurement and taxonomy issues, tools and technology, implementation challenges, safety culture, and organizational considerations. The volumes helped fuel efforts to improve patient safety and provided a measure of progress. More importantly, they also provided a sense of remaining challenges.

What is AHRQ WebM&M?

AHRQ WebM&M serves as a free, online journal and forum for the examination of a variety of patient safety and quality issues. It features analysis of medical error cases by recognized experts and provides interactive learning modules for health care professionals, clinicians, administrators, patient safety officers, and trainees. Since its launch, AHRQ WebM&M has grown in popularity and continues to be one of AHRQ's most frequently visited Web sites.

What is a PSIC?

In response to the need to expand the patient safety knowledge and skills of midlevel professionals responsible for investigating medical errors and initiating improvements, AHRQ partnered with the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Center for Patient Safety and began the first of four 9-mont h Patient Safety Improvement Corps (PSIC) training programs. Participants received training on tools and topics including analyzing root causes, analyzing health care failure modes and effects, applying human factors principles, assessing patient safety culture, and making a business case for patient safety. By the program's end, teams had been trained in every State, as well as the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Feedback the Agency received that PSIC graduates were, in turn, training their own personnel in patient safety principles acquired from the program provided evidence that this program represented a significant step in disseminating patient safety knowledge throughout the country.

What is the most common complication of hospital care?

Data indicate that health care-associated infections (HAIs) are the most common serious complication of hospital care, striking nearly 2 million U.S. hospital patients, resulting in an estimated 99,000 deaths, and costing the health care system up to $20 billion each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The most common HAI is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). With some MRSA-related projects already underway, Congress directed AHRQ to work with its Federal partners at the CDC and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to develop an action plan to identify and help reduce the spread of MRSA and related HAIs. The action plan is designed to:

When was the report "To Err is Human" published?

Background: The “ To Err is Human ” report published by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 1999 called for a national effort to make health care safer. Although the report has been widely credited with spawning efforts to study and improve safety in health care, there has been limited objective assessment of its impact. We evaluated the effects of the IOM report on patient safety publications and research awards.

What is the conclusion of the report "To Err is Human"?

Conclusions: Publication of the report “ To Err is Human ” was associated with an increased number of patient safety publications and research awards. The report appears to have stimulated research and discussion about patient safety issues, but whether this will translate into safer patient care remains unknown.

Is there a need for continued patient safety research support?

Rather, there is a need for continued patient safety research support and increased healthcare quality research support which has recently stalled . Otherwise, there is a risk that patient safety will be dropped as a priority due to a perceived lack of progress, and the impact of “ To Err is Human ” will be short lived.

image

Background

A Framework For Measuring Patient Safety

  • In the 1960s, health services researcher Avedis Donabediandefined a taxonomy for measuring the quality of health care. The "Donabedian triad," which is still widely used today, defines three lenses through which quality may be viewed: 1. Structures—how care is organized 2. Processes—what is done to the patient 3. Outcomes—what ultimately happens to...
See more on psnet.ahrq.gov

Methods For Measuring Patient Safety

  • Several methods that can be used for measuring patient safety events are described in the Table below. Table. Representative Examples of Safety Measurement Strategies (Adapted from Wachter RM. Understanding Patient Safety, Second Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2012. ISBN: 9780071765787.) Retrospective chart review using a two-stage process was originally de…
See more on psnet.ahrq.gov

Problems and Controversies in Measuring Patient Safety

  • Despite the importance of accurately measuring adverse events, existing tools all have limitations, and controversy continues to plague efforts to measure safety and compare safety between organizations. Retrospective chart review using trigger tools or well-defined specific adverse events is often used in research studies, but it is so labor-intensive that most hospitals do not ro…
See more on psnet.ahrq.gov

Current Context

  • Progress has been made toward measuring trends in safety at the national level. The Partnership for Patients—a public-private initiative launched in 2011—uses a combination of 28 metrics to determine a national Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HAC) rate. The HACs include certain health care–associated infections, medication errors, and never events. Analysis by AHRQ has demons…
See more on psnet.ahrq.gov