hit related question 2015 pennsylvania patient safety authority annual report

by Dr. Garnet Pagac 6 min read

Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority 2015 Annual Report

16 hours ago The Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority continued in 2015 to make strides to improve patient safety and try to measure how much standardizing reports might help in that effort. Throughout the 2015 Annual Report, five sections focusing on (1) Data, (2) Standardization, (3) the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Advisory, (4) Education, and >> Go To The Portal


How common is hit as a factor in Pennsylvania medication errors?

A total of 889 medication-error reports listed HIT as a factor contributing to the event submitted to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority between January 1and June 30, 2016. The three most commonly reported event types were dose omission (n = 123), wrong dose/overdosage (n = 97), and extra dose (n = 95).

How does hit affect patient safety?

Although the application of HIT can help improve safety and quality, if not implemented well it can have devastating consequences on patient safety. A total of 889 medication-error reports listed HIT as a factor contributing to the event submitted to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority between January 1and June 30, 2016.

Can I reprint or distribute the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Advisory?

The Pennsylvania Patient Safety Advisory may be reprinted and distributed without restriction, provided it is printed or distributed in its entirety and without alteration. Individual articles may be reprinted in their entirety and without alteration, provided the source is clearly attributed.

What are the most common hit systems implicated in drug abuse?

The most common HIT systems implicated in the events were the computerized prescriber order entry system (CPOE; n = 448), the pharmacy system (n = 251), and the electronic medication administration record (eMAR; n = 250).

image

When did the PA-PSRS guidelines go into effect?

The guidance was devel-oped to help provide consistent standards to acute healthcare facilities in Pennsylvania in determining whether occurrences within facilities meet the stat-utory definitions of serious events, incidents, and in-frastructure failures as defined in section 302 of the

What is an event that could have resulted or did result in harm to a patient?

An event, occurence, or condition that could have resulted or did result in harm to a patient and can be but is not necessarily the result of a defective sys-tem or process design, a system breakdown, equip-ment failure or human error. They can also include adverse events, no-harm events, near misses, and hazardous conditions.

What is the PSA 2020?

Like everyone, much of the PSA’s efforts in 2020 focused on COVID-19. Once news of the pandemic hit , the field staff, led by our team of infection pre-ventionists, began providing virtual consultations for healthcare facilities across Pennsylvania cov-ering everything from cleaning protocols to ob-taining additional personal protective equipment. Sometimes the team just provided emotional sup-port for frontline staff during their darkest hours.

What is the MCARE Act?

The MCARE Act requires each medical facility to des-ignate someone to serve as that facility’s patient safety ocer (PSO). In addition to other duties, the MCARE Act requires the PSO to submit reports to the PSA.

What is a potential adverse event?

“potential adverse event”: An event which either did not reach the patient (“near miss”) or did reach the patient but the level of harm did not require addi-tional healthcare services. The legal definition from the MCARE Act: “an event, occurrence, or situation involving the clinical care of a patient in a medical facility which could have injured the patient but did not either cause an unanticipated injury or require the delivery of additional healthcare services to the patient. The term does not include a serious event.”

What is a PSA analyst?

The analyst is a member of the PSA with education and experience in medicine, nursing, pharmacy, product engineering, statistical analysis, and/or risk management. Analysts review events submit-ted through PA-PSRS and compose the majority of the articles included in the PSA’s quarterly, peer-re-viewed journal, Patient Safety.

How long do you have to report a patient in restraints?

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires hospitals to report to DOH any death of patients in restraints or in seclusion, or in which restraints or seclusion were used within 24 hours of death (other than soft wrist restraints).

image

Abstract

Image
The use of health information technology (HIT) has evolved over the past decade. Although the application of HIT can help improve safety and quality, if not implemented well it can have devastating consequences on patient safety. A total of 889 medication-error reports listed HIT as a factor contributing to the event su…
See more on patientsafety.pa.gov

Introduction

  • In 2009 under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, billions of dollars were offered in incentives for healthcare providers to adopt an electronic health record (EHR).1,2 The hypothesis was that an EHR could prevent errors, enhance patient safety, and improve efficiency. It would accomplish this by eliminating transcription errors due to illegib…
See more on patientsafety.pa.gov

Methods

  • The HIT-related question was introduced into PA-PSRS in April 2015.8 Based on data from the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority 2015 Annual Report, a 45% increase occurred in the number of HIT-related medication error reports received between the second (n = 274) and fourth quarters (n = 397) of 2015.8 In light of the changing nature of facility ...
See more on patientsafety.pa.gov

Results

  • HIT-related errors occurred during every step of the medication-use process (Figure 1). The majority of errors, 69.2% (n = 615 of 889), reached the patient (harm score C through I; Figure 2). Eight (0.9%) errors resulted in patient harm (harm score E through I), with three of these reports involving high-alert medications, medications that bear a heightened risk of patient harm if used …
See more on patientsafety.pa.gov

Discussion

  • Errors due to HIT spanned across all HIT components, including the CPOE system, pharmacy system, electronic medication administration record (eMAR), clinical documentation system, clinical decision support system, ADC, and BCMA system. There were many causes for HIT-related errors, and they were unique depending on the context in which the system was used. Err…
See more on patientsafety.pa.gov

Limitations

  • As with all reporting systems, the type and number of reports collected depend on the degree to which facility reporting is accurate and complete. Although the narrative fields of the reports are helpful in discerning what happened during the event, they often do not contain all of the HIT-related contributing factors. Event descriptions did not always clarify how the event deviated fro…
See more on patientsafety.pa.gov

Strategies

  • The event reports analyzed reveal that errors due to HIT are multifactorial and highly complex. It is important that healthcare organizations and technology vendors continue to work with frontline and informatics staff to address technology-related issues that would improve the usability of the system. Consider the strategies listed below, which are based on events reported to the Authorit…
See more on patientsafety.pa.gov

Conclusion

  • It is clear that ongoing HIT system surveillance and remedial interventions are needed. Oftentimes, failures in the HIT systems are attributed to human error, which hinders the investigation into secondary causes of the patient safety event such as limitations in software interoperability, usability, and workflow processes.1 The interaction between clinician and softw…
See more on patientsafety.pa.gov

Notes

  1. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Health IT and patient safety: building safer systems for better care. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2012. 211 p. Also available: http://www.nationalaca...
  2. ECRI Institute PSO. ECRI Institute PSO Deep Dive: Health Information Technology. Plymouth Meeting (PA): ECRI Institute; 2011.
  1. IOM (Institute of Medicine). Health IT and patient safety: building safer systems for better care. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2012. 211 p. Also available: http://www.nationalaca...
  2. ECRI Institute PSO. ECRI Institute PSO Deep Dive: Health Information Technology. Plymouth Meeting (PA): ECRI Institute; 2011.
  3. Mahoney CD, Berard-Collins CM, Coleman R, Amaral JF, Cotter CM. Effects of an integrated clinical information system on medication safety in a multi-hospital setting. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 S...
  4. Joint Commission. Safe use of health information technology. Sentinel Event Alert. 2015 Mar 31;54:1-6.