21 hours ago · Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Design and Baseline Patient . Characteristics ETDRS Report Number 7 EARLY TREATMENT DIABETIC RETINOPATHY STUDY RESEARCH GROUP* Abstract: The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), a multicenter collaborative clinical trial supported by the National Eye Institute, was designed to … >> Go To The Portal
Classification of diabetic retinopathy from fluorescein angiograms: ETDRS report number 11. Ophthalmology 1991; 98:807-22. 35. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group.
The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) enrolled 3711 patients with mild-to-severe nonproliferative or early proliferative diabetic retinopathy in both eyes. One eye of each patient was assigned randomly to early photocoagulation and the other to deferral of photocoagulation.
To produce natural history data that can be used to identify risk factors and test etiologic hypotheses in diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate argon laser photocoagulation and aspirin treatment in the management of patients with nonproliferative or early proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
The recommendation was that scatter treatment should be deferred for eyes with mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. As the retinopathy progresses to the severe nonproliferative or early proliferative stage, scatter treatment should be considered, especially for patients with NIDDM.
The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), a multicenter collaborative clinical trial supported by the National Eye Institute, was designed to assess whether argon laser photocoagulation or aspirin treatment can reduce the risk of visual loss or slow the progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with ...
The ETDRS and DRSS evolutionETDRS LevelDisease SeverityDefinition61Mild PDRNVE < 1/2 disc area in 1 or more quadrants65Moderate PDRNVE ≥ 1/2 disc area in 1 or more quadrants or NVD < 1/4–1/3 disc area71-75High-Risk PDRNVD ≥ 1/4–1/3 disc area and/or vitreous hemorrhage81-85Advanced PDRFundus partially obscured6 more rows•Feb 4, 2021
ETDRS Acuity. ETDRS acuity testing has become the worldwide standard for visual acuity testing, replacing the Snellen and Sloan acuity tests. ETDRS stands for Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. The ETDRS test is designed to eliminate inaccuracies in the Snellen and Sloan tests.
The ETDRS Disease Severity Scale was developed to differentiate severe proliferative from nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. It was based on the quantity and location of microaneurysms, intraretinal microvascular anomalies (IRMA), venous beading, hemorrhage, and neovascularization.
A loss of ≥ 3 lines (≥ 15 letters) on an ETDRS chart corresponds to a doubling of the visual angle and is considered moderate visual loss, while a loss of ≥ 6 lines (≥ 30 letters) corresponds to a quadrupling of the visual angle and is considered severe.
This article provides tips on caring for patients with diabetes, including advice calibrated to the specific stages of diabetic retinopathy (Table).WHAT TO LOOK FOR. ... STAGE 1: MILD NPDR. ... STAGE 2: MODERATE NPDR. ... STAGE 3: SEVERE NPDR. ... STAGE 4: PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY.
ETDRS charts were theoretically superior to Snellen charts because interpatient differences were more accurately measured and longitudinal follow-up measurements had more consistent precision, regardless of whether the patients had high or low levels of visual acuity.
0.00 (highlighted) is considered 'normal' visual acuity, also called 6/6 or 20/20 vision. Numbers less than this mean that vision is better than 'normal'. Numbers bigger than this means that vision is less than normal.
One goal of a complete eye examination is to determine the best corrected visual acuity, abbreviated BCVA. Normal visual acuity is generally accepted as 20/20, although many people can see 20/15, and a few can see 20/10.
Intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (or IrMAs) are shunt vessels and appear as abnormal branching or dilation of existing blood vessels (capillaries) within the retina that act to supply areas of non-perfusion in diabetic retinopathy.
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)
The eligibility criteria for the ETDRS were designed to include a broad range of macular edema severity, from a few small hard exudates within a disc diameter of the fovea with normal visual acu ity to extensive cystoid spaces with a visual acuity of 20/200. All study patients had one eye randomly assigned to immediate photocoagulation and the other eye to deferral of photocoagulation until high-risk proliferative retinopathy developed. During followup, additional photocoagulation was allowed for any degree of macular edema within the eligibility range, but additional photocoagulation was required only for edema involving or threatening the center of the macula. The term "clinically significant macular edema" was coined to designate this level of severity.
ETDRS was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate argon laser photocoagulation and aspirin treatment in the management of patients with nonproliferative or early proliferative diabetic retinopathy. A total of 3,711 patients were recruited to be followed for a minimum of 4 years to provide long-term information on the risks and benefits of the treatments under study.
The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), a multicenter collaborative clinical trial supported by the National Eye Institute, was designed to assess whether argon laser photocoagulation or aspirin treatment can reduce the risk of visual loss or slow the progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with mild-to-severe nonproliferative or early proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
The ETDRS study was a landmark trial in that it demonstrated conclusively the benefit of focal macular laser in the treatment of diabetic macular oedema. It also set out the criteria for treatment of "clinically significant macular oedema" - criteria which are still used today in determining which patients should be treated with macular laser.
Results. Aspirin. Aspirin use did not affect the progression of retinopathy to the high-risk proliferative stage in eyes assigned to deferral of photocoagulation. However, aspirin did not increase the risk of vitreous hemorrhage, did not affect vision, and was associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular disease.
The ETDRS study was also crucial in determining that scatter laser PRP reduces the risk of disease progression and vision loss - but that scatter treatment can be delayed until the development of severe non-proliferative or early proliferative stage retinopathy.
The recommendation was that scatter treatment should be deferred for eyes with mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. As the retinopathy progresses to the severe nonproliferative or early proliferative stage, scatter treatment should be considered, especially for patients with NIDDM.
The recommendation was that scatter treatment should be deferred for eyes with mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. As the retinopathy progresses to the severe nonproliferative or early proliferative stage, scatter treatment should be considered, especially for patients with NIDDM. Scatter photocoagulation should be performed for virtually all eyes with high-risk proliferative retinopathy. Finally, early vitrectomy should be considered for advanced active proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and most importantly, all patients with diabetic retinopathy should receive careful followup.
Finally, the ETDRS study established that aspirin has no role in preventing the progression of diabetic retinopathy, but that equally, it is not contraindicated and can be used where other cardiovascular indications require.
The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), a multicenter collaborative clinical trial supported by the National Eye Institute, was designed to assess whether argon laser photocoagulation or aspirin treatment can reduce the risk of visual loss or slow the progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with mild-to- severe nonproliferative or early proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The 3711 patients enrolled in the ETDRS were assigned randomly to either aspirin (650 mg per day) or placebo. One eye of each patient was assigned randomly to early argon laser photocoagulation and the other to deferral of photocoagulation. Both eyes were to be examined at least every 4 months and photocoagulation was to be initiated in eyes assigned to deferral as soon as high-risk proliferative retinopathy was detected. Examination of a large number of baseline ocular and patient characteristics indicated that there were no important differences between randomized treatment groups at baseline. Continue reading >>
Volume 98, Issue 5, Supplement , May 1991, Pages 741-756 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Design and Baseline Patient Characteristics: ETDRS Report Number 7 Get rights and content The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS ), a multicenter collaborative clinical trial supported by the National Eye Institute, was designed to assess whether argon laser photocoagulation or aspirin treatment can reduce the risk of visual loss or slow the progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with mild-to-severe nonproliferative or early proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The 3711 patients enrolled in the ETDRS were assigned randomly to either aspirin (650 mg per day) or placebo. One eye of each patient was assigned randomly to early argon laser photocoagulation and the other to deferral of photocoagulation. Both eyes were to be examined at least every 4 months and photocoagulation was to be initiated in eyes assigned to deferral as soon as high-risk proliferative retinopathy was detected. Examination of a large number of baseline ocular and patient characteristics indicated that there were no important differences between randomized treatment groups at baseline. Continue reading >>
EarlyTreatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) To evaluate theeffectiveness of both argon laser photocoagulation and aspirin therapyin delaying or preventing progression of early diabetic retinopathy tomore severe stages of visual loss and blindness. To help determinethe best time to initiate photocoagulation treatment in diabetic retinopathy. To monitor closelythe effects of diabetes mellitus and of photocoagulation on visual function. To producenatural history data that can be used to identify risk factors and testetiologic hypotheses in diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS was a multicenter,randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate argon laser photocoagulationand aspirin treatment in the management of patients with nonproliferativeor early proliferative diabetic retinopathy. A total of 3,711 patientswere recruited to be followed for a minimum of 4 years to provide long-terminformation on the risks and benefits of the treatments under study. The eligibilitycriteria for the ETDRS were designed to include a broad range of macularoedema severity, from a few small hard exudates within a disc diameterof the fovea with normal visual acuity to extensive cystoid spaces witha visual acuity of 20/200. All study patients had one eye randomly assignedto immediate photocoagulation and the other eye to deferral of photocoagulationuntil high-risk proliferative retinopathy developed. During followup, additionalphotocoagulation was allowed for any degree of macular oedema within theeligibility range, but additional photocoagulation was required only foroedema involving or threatening the center of the macula. The term "clinicallysignificant macular oedema" was coined to designate this level of severity. The trial useof aspirin therapy was based on clinical observation and on aspirin's Continue reading >>
Data from the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) show that focal photocoagulation of "clinically significant" diabetic macular edema substantially reduces the risk of visual loss. Focal treatment also increases the chance of visual improvement, decreases the frequency of persistent macular edema, and causes only minor visual field losses. In this randomized clinical trial, which was supported by the National Eye Institute, 754 eyes that had macular edema and mild to moderate diabetic retinopathy were randomly assigned to focal argon laser photocoagulation, while 1,490 such eyes were randomly assigned to deferral of photocoagulation. The beneficial effects of treatment demonstrated in this trial suggest that all eyes with clinically significant diabetic macular edema should be considered for focal photocoagulation. Clinically significant macular edema is defined as retinal thickening that involves or threatens the center of the macula (even if visual acuity is not yet reduced) and is assessed by stereo contact lens biomicroscopy or stereo photography. Follow-up of all ETDRS patients continues without other modifications in the study protocol. Continue reading >>
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Design and Baseline Patient Characteristics ETDRS Report Number 7 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), a multicenter collaborative clinical trial supported by the National Eye Institute, was designed to assess whether argon laser photocoagulation or aspirin treatment can reduce the risk of visual loss or slow the progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with mild-to-severe nonproliferative or early proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The 3711 patients enrolled in the ETDRS were assigned randomly to either aspirin (650 mg per day) or placebo. One eye of each patient was assigned randomly to early argon laser photocoagulation and the other to deferral of photocoagulation. Both eyes were to be examined at least every 4 months and photocoagulation was to be initiated in eyes assigned to deferral as soon as high-risk proliferative retinopathy was detected. Examination of a large number of baseline ocular and patient characteristics indicated that there were no important differences between randomized treatment groups at baseline. 2018 Digital Science & Research Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved | About us Privacy policy Legal terms VPAT Citation Count is the number of times that this paper has been cited by other published papers in the database. The Altmetric Attention Score is a weighted count of all of the online attention Altmetric have found for an individual research output. This includes mentions in public policy documents and references in Wikipedia, the mainstream news, social networks, blogs and more. More detail on the weightings of each source and how they contribute to the attention score is available here . The Relative Citation Rati Continue reading >>
ETDRS stands for Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. The ETDRS test is designed to eliminate inaccuracies in the Snellen and Sloan tests. Standardized ETDRS CSV-1000 and ESV-3000 Both the CSV-1000 and the ESV-3000 ETDRS testing device have patented (Patent # 5,078,486) self-calibrated test lighting. The CSV-1000 device incorporates highly advanced miniature standardized fluorescent light source technology. The ESV-3000 device incorporates highly advanced LED light source technology. The auto-calibration circuitry constantly monitors the fluorescent/LED light source and calibrates each test luminance to 85 cd/m2 or 3 cd/m2. Other ETDRS testers are not standardized and have no circuitry to control the test lighting. They use "off-the-shelf" non-standardized fluorescent bulbs that require a bulb "burn-in" period. The bulbs must be constantly replaced and each time a bulb is replaced, there is an additional "burn-in" period. No testing can be accomplished during the "burn-in" period. The CSV-1000 allows testing up to 20/200 at a test distance of 8 feet. The device is operated by infrared remote control. The ESV-3000 is the only large-format standardized ETDRS testing device. The ESV-3000 allows testing up to 20/200 ETDRS Acuity at a test distance of 4 meters The device is operated by infrared remote control. The ESV-3000 is designed specifically for clinical trials where large-format ETDRS testing (up to 20/200) is performed at 4 meters. Unlike other large-format back-lit devices for ETDRS evaluation, the light level is calibrated and held constant, allowing the automatic replication of testing light levels from different clinical trials l Continue reading >>
EarlyTreatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) To evaluate theeffectiveness of both argon laser photocoagulation and aspirin therapyin delaying or preventing progression of early diabetic retinopathy tomore severe stages of visual loss and blindness. To help determinethe best time to initiate photocoagulation treatment in diabetic retinopathy. To monitor closelythe effects of diabetes mellitus and of photocoagulation on visual function. To producenatural history data that can be used to identify risk factors and testetiologic hypotheses in diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS was a multicenter,randomized clinical trial designed to evaluate argon laser photocoagulationand aspirin treatment in the management of patients with nonproliferativeor early proliferative diabetic retinopathy. A total of 3,711 patientswere recruited to be followed for a minimum of 4 years to provide long-terminformation on the risks and benefits of the treatments under study. The eligibilitycriteria for the ETDRS were designed to include a broad range of macularoedema severity, from a few small hard exudates within a disc diameterof the fovea with normal visual acuity to extensive cystoid spaces witha visual acuity of 20/200. All study patients had one eye randomly assignedto immediate photocoagulation and the other eye to deferral of photocoagulationuntil high-risk proliferative retinopathy developed. During followup, additionalphotocoagulation was allowed for any degree of macular oedema within theeligibility range, but additional photocoagulation was required only foroedema involving or threatening the center of the macula. The term "clinicallysignificant macular oedema" was coined to designate this level of severity. The trial useof aspirin therapy was based on clinical observation and on aspirin's Continue reading >>
A Proposed International Clinical Disease Severity Grading Scale for Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema Diabetes and Retinopathy: the Scope of the Problem Diabetes mellitus remains a profound health issue worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that there are currently 150 million people with diabetes and that this number will double by the year 2025. [1] More than 90% of the new cases of diabetes are type 2. In the United States, approximately 17 million people, or 6.2% of the population, have diabetes, although approximately 6 million are unaware that they have the disorder. [2] Diabetes is particularly common in certain races: American Indians are 2.5 times as likely and African Americans are twice as likely to have the disorder compared with white Americans. [2] Thirteen percent of all non-Hispanic African Americans and 10.2% of Hispanic/Latino Americans have diabetes. Most individuals with diabetes will ultimately develop diabetic retinopathy (DR). The likelihood of developing this complication depends on a variety of factors, including type and duration of diabetes, quality of glucose control, blood pressure, and serum lipid levels. [3-5] Duration of diabetes is the major variable related to the incidence of DR. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that in the United States, up to 24,000 patients with diabetes become legally blind each year, and DR remains the leading cause of blindness in patients aged 20 to 74 years. [2] DR is also a major cause of blindness in the other industrialized countries of the world, and the increasing rates of diabetes incidence, coupled with a reduction in blindness due to other causes, will result in diabetic blindness becoming more statistically significant in other countries. Loss o Continue reading >>
When retinopathy is more severe, sca tter photocoagulation should be considered and usually should not be delayed if the eye has reached the high-risk proliferative stage. ...
The ETDRS results demonstrate that, for eyes with macular edema, focal photocoagulation is effective in reducing the risk of moderat e visual loss but that scatter photocoagulation is not. Focal treatment also increases the chance of visual improvement, decreases the frequency of persistent macular edema, and causes only minor visual field losses.