5 hours ago The Canadian Medical Protective Association reports that over a recent 5-year period, 65% of medical legal actions involving informed consent were surgical and only 21% of these cases were decided in favour of the surgeon. 1 We examined the documentation of informed consent by general surgeons at the General Campus of the Ottawa Hospital and found it to be poor (Appendix 1, available at ... >> Go To The Portal
When the consent discussion takes place on the day of surgery, new opportunities for misunderstanding and liability are introduced. Q I perform refractive surgery at several laser surgery centers. Sometimes, I meet the patient for the first time on the day of surgery.
Of those receiving the written consent form, 52.0% had gotten it the day before the surgery at the earliest 41.1% received it some hours or immediately before the procedure. The written IC form was explained to 65.6% of the patients, and 93.9% of them received further oral information that deemed understandable.
Emergency or life-threatening situation: An emergency or life-threatening situation is one of the only exceptions to lack of surgical consent. However, some matters are not so clear and thus may require a court to intervene.
For example, a doctor is generally not allowed to perform an additional surgery while the patient is undergoing their scheduled procedure unless an emergency situation arises that threatens the patient’s life. If the additional procedure was not life threatening, then the patient may be able to recover damages for medical malpractice.
Before having your operation, you will be asked to indicate that you understand the nature of the surgical procedure to be performed and that you give your permission for the operation. This may appear to be a formality, but, in fact, this process should be taken very seriously.
Consent must be voluntary, and a patient should have the freedom to revoke the consent. If consent is given under fear of intimidation, or if it includes misconceptions or misrepresentation of facts, it can be considered invalid.
Informed consent is meant to honor your right to decide what's done with your body. Rules and the law pertaining to this topic have changed over the years, but one thing hasn't: Failure to obtain informed consent is a crime—medical malpractice, specifically—and the doctor can be charged with negligence and battery.
Consent should be obtained after the surgeon discusses the risks, bene- fits, and alternatives with the patient, and prior to the patient making the final decision to undergo the procedure.
The Legal Matter of Informed Consent constitutes assault and battery" [2]. In other words, a patient's consent must be given, either expressly or implicitly, before a physician may legally "interfere" with the physical body of the patient.
While implied consent is informal, informed consent is a legal term that requires seven elements to be valid: The individual is competent and can understand what they're consenting to. For example, a patient with dementia may not give informed consent.
If a doctor fails to obtain informed consent for non-emergency treatment, he or she may be charged with a civil offense like gross negligence and/or a criminal offense such as battery or gross negligence which is the unauthorized touching of the plaintiff's person.
There are 4 components of informed consent including decision capacity, documentation of consent, disclosure, and competency.
Informed consent is mandatory for all clinical trials involving human beings. The consent process must respect the patient's ability to make decisions and adhere the individual hospital rules for clinical studies.
When informed consent is required for a procedure, which of the following steps should occur prior to the patient signing the form? The provider should review alternative procedures with the patient.
Informed consent in the U.S. can be overridden in emergency medical situations pursuant to 21CFR50. 24, which was first brought to the general public's attention via the controversy surrounding the study of Polyheme.
These documents include:A will or living trust.Advance Care Directive (Living will)Health Care Proxy (Power of attorney)Durable power of attorney.A synopsis of your medical history and a list of medicines you take or have taken.Medical information release.More items...
In certain surgeries, where significant risks are involved, hospital staff may encourage you to prepare "advance directives." Advance directives ar...
Prior to surgery, you will receive a careful explanation of the procedure, its purpose, any risks, and the expected outcome. You may also be asked...
Sometimes an adult patient cannot make decisions (temporarily or permanently) about medical care, either because of accidental unconsciousness, con...
Parental consent is required for any diagnostic procedure or surgery on a pre-adolescent child. However, "emancipated" adolescents may consent to t...
Informed consent for surgery has become a critical component of surgical practice. There are specific legal requirements for what has to be disclosed to patients and for the accompanying documentation. The hospital consent for surgery form with the patient’s signature is a small part of the process. A quality assurance review of the documentation of informed consent by our surgical group indicated major deficiencies and prompted this article (and its Appendix containing further information). Our intent was to inform surgeons about modern standards and to discuss particular challenges. Informed consent for surgery entails what surgeons communicate to their patients about the proposed surgery and is a key element in the trust patients have in surgeons. It is of increasing importance, and we must keep up to date with patient and legal expectations.
Proper documentation is the only objective measurement of what information was communicated to the patient and provides legal protection for the surgeon. The defence of “I cannot remember this particular patient but my usual practice is…” does not suffice. Although consent can be implied or expressed orally, consent for surgical procedures requires recorded documentation. The minimum recommended documentation is the date of the dialogue, who was involved, material and unique risks discussed, any special circumstances of the patient, the risk of not having the surgery and whether consent was obtained or refused.2A frequent finding in our retrospective chart review was that the documentation of the informed consent discussion was found in the operating room (OR) report, dictated after completion of the procedure (Appendix 1). If a complication occurs in the OR, documentation after the fact about the discussion of that particular risk is of questionable value.
Challenges to obtaining informed consent may arise. Surgery produces anxiety in patients, and some display this stress more than others. Hearing their surgeon iterate a long list of things that can go wrong is frightening. Although patient autonomy includes the right to refuse necessary surgery and the “therapeutic privilege” of withholding information is outdated,4we want to minimize patients’ fear and avoid anxiety-induced excess catecholamine release causing problems at administration of anesthesia. The surgeon’s calm, reassuring demeanour goes a long way in relieving this stress. Family members can be helpful with the occasional patient who does not wish to hear about any potential complications.
Part of the discussion requires surgeons to make reasonable attempts to answer the patients’ questions. The majority of these questions are straightforward, and a simple, clear response usually suffices to bring relief to the patient and their concerned family. With all the information available on the Internet, patients may wish to engage in an intensive, detailed discussion, and the surgeon must be patient while facilitating their understanding of the wealth of data they have acquired.
Templates may facilitate proper documentation and serve to remind the surgeon of important details to include in the discussion with the patient, although the discussion and documentation have to be individualized for each patient. Audiovisual recording of the consent process is common in the United States and could be useful in Canada if the surgeon anticipates a very difficult, contentious process. The assistance of an experienced colleague and a legal professional would be prudent in such a situation.
The ‘traditional’ approach to consent contained some negative elements. A doctor who was incapable of performing the proposed operation often obtained consent. In a genuine attempt to protect patients from anxiety, the rare-but-grave potential complications were sometimes not discussed. There was uncertainty about what should properly be disclosed, compounded by conflicting messages from the courts. The consent was sometimes taken from people who were ineligible to provide it.
Consent protects the doctor from the accusation of an unwanted touch. Whilst the jostling on the crowded train or the melee in the supermarket at Christmas inevitably results in uninvited and potentially unwelcome touches from strangers, society dismisses these as inevitable irritants of modern life. However, the strong principle that a stranger will not touch us without our permission is all pervasive, and is an important manifestation of our individual autonomy.
A child of 16 years is presumed to have the capacity to consent, although a parent or the local authority may also give consent under some circumstances up to the age of 18 years. There is no presumption that children below 16 years have capacity, but it may be demonstrated by a child of any age (Table 2).9This is clearly a comprehensive test of capacity. This is to be expected, as it would be inappropriate to allow children to agree to interventions if there was a risk that they were not fully aware of what they are agreeing to. Nevertheless, it is clear that, on a daily basis, many adults who give their consent unchallenged would fail this test.
These are, to an extent, proportionate to the affront caused. Most patients will automatically accept the first touch, because that is the welcoming handshake. Many patients would silently object to their abdomen being pummelled unless they were politely asked their permission, but most would dismiss it merely as rudeness on the doctor's behalf. However, an adverse outcome, combined with invalid consent, is increasingly likely to lead to a successful claim in clinical negligence.1
To determine whether an adult patient has the ability to understand what is involved, the courts have developed a three-stage test (Table 1).8
There is no requirement in common law for written consent. There are some statutes that make it mandatory for specified procedures, such as forms of fertility treatment,3but the value of the signed consent form is that it provides some evidence of a contract between the patient and the doctor. If only for the purposes of defending claims, the state and, therefore, hospitals, make signed consent mandatory.
This is a fiction, since there is no valid consent. However, the patient's lack of objection at the time of the procedure means that he will not subsequently be permitted to rely on the fact that he did not actually consent.
You may also be asked to sign an "informed consent" form, which states in detail that you understand everything involved with your surgery. You should read through ...
Sometimes an adult patient cannot make decisions (temporarily or permanently) about medical care, either because of accidental unconsciousness, confusion due to old age, or severe illness. In those instances, a family member will be asked to make any necessary medical decisions.
In certain surgeries, where significant risks are involved, hospital staff may encourage you to prepare "advance directives." Advance directives are legal documents that state a patient's preference in treatment and resuscitation - if the patient is unable to speak for himself or herself. There are two types of advance directives:
Parental consent is required for any diagnostic procedure or surgery on a pre-adolescent child. However, "emancipated" adolescents may consent to their own medical care. An emancipated adolescent is someone who meets any of the following criteria: Is married. Attends college away from home.
If they fail to get your consent and move forward with the surgery regardless, they may be charged with a criminal offense. In addition to surgical consent, you must also provide informed consent. This type of consent means that you have been informed of all potential risks and consequences associated with the procedure.
Generally speaking, surgical consent basically means that you have given your doctor or surgeon permission to perform a procedure. Although this type of consent does not necessarily need to be in writing, a doctor or surgeon is legally required to obtain some form of your consent (e.g., in writing or oral) before they can proceed with the procedure.
As discussed above, the remedies for injuries connected to non-consensual surgery will depend on the facts of a case and the laws of a particular state. The plaintiff must also suffer harm as a result of the non-consensual surgery. Some damages that the plaintiff may be able to recover include:
The defendant may be able to raise one of the following defenses against a claim where surgical consent is at issue, including: Statute of limitations: The plaintiff must file an action within the time frame provided by the statute of limitations in their jurisdiction.
If the plaintiff fails to prove their case, then the defendant may be able to raise this as a defense to their claim.
Consent: If the defendant can prove that the plaintiff did in fact provide proper consent, then the case will automatically be dismissed.
Unlike surgical consent, which essentially just says you agreed to the surgery, informed consent assumes that you have a complete understanding of what can happen during or after the procedure. Both forms of consent are required by law. Thus, you must provide both to your doctor or surgeon before they can legally perform the operation.
When the consent discussion takes place on the day of surgery, new opportunities for misunderstanding and liability are introduced.
OMIC is also endorsed by 54 other ophthalmic societies. The OMIC partnerships with state and subspecialty societies qualifies their members for an exclusive 10% premium credit. Contact your state society for details.
If the patient cannot be seen until the day of surgery (e.g., either the surgeon or the patient lives far away), but the type of surgery is already determined, taking a few extra steps before the day of surgery will facilitate patient understanding and ensure that consent is both informed and voluntary. Obtain information from the referring ...
It is usually prudent to postpone the surgery and give the patient time to reconsider. However, if you know the patient well, and you are completely comfortable with proceeding, you should have and document an informed consent discussion, preferably in front of witnesses.
If a doctor fails to obtain informed consent for non-emergency treatment, he or she may be charged with a civil offense like gross negligence and/or a criminal offense such as battery or gross negligence which is the unauthorized touching of the plaintiff's person. In a civil suit, the patient would have to show two elements. Medical treatment could be unauthorized because the doctor didn’t fully explain either the procedure or the risks associated with the procedure. First, the patient must show that the doctor performed the treatment or procedure without her informed consent. Second, the patient has to show that had she known about the risks of the procedure, she would’ve decided not to have it done and, therefore, avoided the injury.
Informed Consent. Virtually all states have recognized, either by legislation or by common law, the right to receive information about one's medical condition, treatment choices, risks associated with the treatments, and prognosis.
Medical treatment could be unauthorized because the doctor didn’t fully explain either the procedure or the risks associated with the procedure. First, the patient must show that the doctor performed the treatment or procedure without her informed consent.
First, the patient must show that the doctor performed the treatment or procedure without her informed consent. Second, the patient has to show that had she known about the risks of the procedure, she would’ve decided not to have it done and, therefore, avoided the injury.
Second-guessing a doctor’s behavior can be intimidating, especially with complicated legal concepts like informed consent and negligence. If you would like to know if you have a case or just what rights you have, you can contact a medical malpractice attorney. That way, you could make an informed decision about your next steps.
The informed consent process isn’t only an ethical obligation for doctors -- it is also a legal one. State laws often take a patient-centered approach.
Minors, unlike adults, are generally presumed to be incompetent. Therefore, they are unable to give consent to medical treatment and procedures. In these cases, the parent or guardian of the child must give consent on the minor’s behalf.
When an event results in an injury to a person or damage to property, incident reporting becomes a must. Unfortunately, for every medical error, almost 100 errors remain unreported. There are many reasons for unreported medical incidents, but not knowing when to report is one of the most common ones.
At QUASR, we believe all staff (and patients, too) should be able to report incidents or potential incidents they have witnessed. But in practice, it is a bit different. Some hospitals have designated persons who are authorized to file the reports. In some other hospitals, the staff usually updates their supervisor about an incident, then can file the report.
An incident is an unfavourable event that affects patient or staff safety. The typical healthcare incidents are related to physical injuries, medical errors, equipment failure, administration, patient care, or others. In short, anything that endangers a patient’s or staff’s safety is called an incident in the medical system.
Improving patient safety is the ultimate goal of incident reporting. From enhancing safety standards to reducing medical errors, incident reporting helps create a sustainable environment for your patients. Eventually, when your hospital offers high-quality patient care, it will build a brand of goodwill.
Clinical risk management, a subset of healthcare risk management, uses incident reports as essential data points. Risk management aims to ensure the hospital administrators know their institution performance and identify addressable issues that increase their exposure.
Usually, nurses or other hospital staff file the report within 24 to 48 hours after the incident occurred. The outcomes improve by recording incidents while the memories of the event are still fresh.
Correcting the root causes can easily avoid future incidents of that type. In this sense, root cause analysis of an incident is an essential investigation step for all hospitals to ensure their staff and patients are safe under most conditions.
In our study, the patients with a higher educational level and who were not older than 60 years old were more likely to read the IC form [ 25 ]. Secondly, surgeons might have shown a lack of interest in the document, sought signatures without giving adequate support and motivation to the patients and hence did not explain to them the importance of reading the document [ 22, 26, 27, 28 ]. Thirdly, almost half the patients received the form immediately or just a few hours before the surgical procedure—when they were more stressed and vulnerable, with little time to read and reflect on it [ 13 ]. A probable reason for this is that in the Italian culture, physicians regard the delivery and the signing of written IC form as a fulfillment of the law [ 3 ], while more importance is given to oral information. Indeed, two-thirds of patients reported that at the handover, the consent was also explained, and almost all received information beyond what was in the IC form at various times before the surgical intervention.
Complete information before an invasive procedure is an ethical requirement, and it is very important to involve the patient in decision-making regarding the treatment. Well-informed patients are generally more satisfied and file fewer legal claims [ 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 ].
The questionnaire, which was divided into four sections, was formulated after an extensive literature search. The four questionnaire sections were as follows:
Seeking informed consent is often a formal act in which a patient’s signature is obtained, with physicians believing that an important obligation has been fulfilled regardless of whether the patient has been provided with adequate information about the medical intervention that is about to take place [ 3 ].
The written IC form was given to 84.5% of those interviewed. All recipients of the form signed it, either personally or through a delegate; however, 13.9% did not know/remember having done so; 51.8% said that they read it thoroughly. Of those who reported to have read it, 90.9% judged it to be clear. Of those receiving the written consent form, 52.0% had gotten it the day before the surgery at the earliest 41.1% received it some hours or immediately before the procedure. The written IC form was explained to 65.6% of the patients, and 93.9% of them received further oral information that deemed understandable. Most attention was given to the diagnosis and the type of surgical procedure, which was communicated respectively to 92.8 and 88.2% of the patients. Almost one in two patients believed that the information provided some emotional relief, while 23.2% experienced increased anxiety. Younger patients (age ≤ 60) and patients with higher levels of education were more likely to read the written IC form.
Informed consent (IC) is a process by which a physician interacts with a patient, enabling the latter to make a knowledgeable decision regarding the treatment of his or her disease. IC consists not only of the form that patients must read and sign, it also involves oral communication that helps physicians establish a stronger relationship with the patients, which is considered by some to be a prerequisite for well-reasoned decision-making [ 1 ]. Moreover, two distinct but interrelated components characterize IC: the information about risks, benefits and alternatives and consent to undergo the proposed surgical procedure.
Informed consent (IC) is an essential step in helping patients be aware of consequences of their treatment decisions. With surgery, it is vitally important for patients to understand the risks and benefits of the procedure and decide accordingly. We explored whether a written IC form was provided to patients; whether they read and signed it;