14 hours ago Jun 01, 2019 · A multicenter randomized clinical trial in France found an overall survival benefit of web-based patient-reported outcome (PRO)–based surveillance after initial treatment for lung cancer compared with conventional surveillance. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of this PRO-based surveillance in lung cancer patients. >> Go To The Portal
Jun 01, 2019 · A multicenter randomized clinical trial in France found an overall survival benefit of web-based patient-reported outcome (PRO)–based surveillance after initial treatment for lung cancer compared with conventional surveillance. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of this PRO-based surveillance in lung cancer patients.
Background: Although electronic medical record (EMR)-tethered patient portals are common in other countries, they are still emerging in Canada. Objective: We aimed to report user satisfaction and the effects of a patient portal on medical appointment attendance in a Canadian cohort of patients within our publicly funded health care system.
Feb 15, 2019 · Cost-Effectiveness of Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Surveillance in Patients With Lung Cancer. Lizée T 1, Basch E 2, Trémolières P 1, Voog E 3, Domont J 3, Peyraga G 1, Urban T 4, Bennouna J 5, Septans AL 6, Balavoine M 6, Detournay B 7, Denis F 1. Author information. Affiliations. 4 authors. 1. ...
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of web-based treatment for phobic outpatients on a waiting list for psychotherapy: protocol of a randomised controlled trial. Robin Niels Kok, Annemieke van Straten, Aartjan T F Beekman, Judith E Bosmans, Manja de Neef, Pim Cuijpers.
Telemedicine was found to be more cost effective ($335 per patient/year) compared to routine care ($585 per patient/year) and on-site care ($1,166 per patient/year).
Improve Clinical Outcomes Patient portals make tasks such as requesting prescription refills and referrals easier and more convenient leads to greater patient compliance – and when patients follow doctors' orders, clinical outcomes improve.Dec 8, 2017
Limit Operating Costs and Save Money In addition, patient portals help to save money. Portals can save time and money by automating basic administrative tasks. Moreover, physician's time is critical but also limited. It's critical to provide the most efficient use of their time while at work.Jun 8, 2021
What are the Top Pros and Cons of Adopting Patient Portals?Pro: Better communication with chronically ill patients.Con: Healthcare data security concerns.Pro: More complete and accurate patient information.Con: Difficult patient buy-in.Pro: Increased patient ownership of their own care.Feb 17, 2016
A patient portal is a secure online website that gives patients convenient, 24-hour access to personal health information from anywhere with an Internet connection. Using a secure username and password, patients can view health information such as: Recent doctor visits. Discharge summaries. Medications.Sep 29, 2017
Background. Engaging patients in the delivery of health care has the potential to improve health outcomes and patient satisfaction. Patient portals may enhance patient engagement by enabling patients to access their electronic medical records (EMRs) and facilitating secure patient-provider communication.
Other disadvantages of patient portals include alienation and health disparities. Alienation between patient and provider occurs for those who don't access these tools. Sometimes, this is due to health disparities if a person doesn't have a method for using them.Nov 11, 2021
4 Pros and Cons of Digital Patient Health Data AccessPro: Patients enjoy digital data access.Con: Complicated health info causes concern for patients, docs.Pro: Patients can review info for medical errors.Con: Clinician notes raise patient-provider relationship concerns.Aug 10, 2017
The patient portal supports two-way communication, which allows the patient to work with physicians between patient visits, request appointments, and receive reminders. These reminders can be for appointments, need for follow-up, and more.
A multicenter randomized clinical trial in France found an overall survival benefit of web-based patient-reported outcome (PRO)–based surveillance after initial treatment for lung cancer compared with conventional surveillance. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of this PRO-based surveillance in lung cancer patients.
After initial treatment for localized or advanced lung cancers, patients are generally followed for recurrence or progression via surveillance consisting of serial imaging and consultations with oncologists.
As described previously, from June 2014 to January 2016, 121 patients treated for lung cancer (NSCLC or SCLC lung cancer) staged as at least cTxN1/pTxpN1 to TxNxM+ (seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer), nonprogressive at inclusion, with a performance status of 0 to 2, with internet access and prior e-mail experience, were included in a final intent-to-treat analysis ( Supplementary Table 1 ).
Data of total numbers of clinical consultations, imaging, travel, and deaths in both arms are shown in Table 1. During the study period, there were more consultations in the experimental arm than in the control arm (193 and 133, respectively). The distribution of imaging was not significantly different between arms ( p =.069).
In this analysis of data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial, weekly remote symptom monitoring via e-PRO among patients with lung cancer, compared to conventional follow-up monitoring, was highly cost-effective for society. These data add to prior data showing OS benefits. 9
Part of RXNT's cloud-based EHR system, the Patient Portal tool boosts patient satisfaction, expands doctor-patient communication, and improves convenience. Empower your patients to schedule appointments, send secure messages, review lab results, sign documents and forms, and pay bills online. Auto-reminders keep patients informed about appointments and prescriptions. Plus, patients have access to a wealth of health information provided by Medline, a premier bibliographic database. Learn more about RXNT
ChartLogic offers Connect Patient, a multifunction patient portal. It allows access through any device or browser for both physicians and patients. This allows physicians to engage with patients through a convenient portal to improve the overall patient experience and quality of care. A few features Connect Patient offers are RX Refill Requests, Appointment Reminders, Pay Bills Online, Appointment Requests, and much more. Learn more about Connect Patient
Caspio is the world's leading LOW-CODE platform for building compliant patient portal applications without having to write code. Ranked a 'Leader' by Forrester Research, Caspio empowers you to collaborate efficiently, manage patients effectively, and deliver personalized care using a customizable all-in-one platform that's built to meet the specific needs of your organization; all without the IT overhead. See why Caspio is trusted by leading healthcare organizations. Try Caspio for FREE. Learn more about Caspio
Ambra Health is a cloud-based medical data and image management company. Intuitive, scalable and highly interoperable, the Ambra cloud platform is designed to serve as the backbone of imaging innovation and progress for healthcare providers. Patient portal image enablement provides a simple alternative to image distribution via CD. Patients are given the ability to create an account to upload imaging, store their priors, and view imaging in a personal health record. Learn more about Ambra Health
Educational content hosted on patient portals can make it easier for patients to take a more active role in their care. They can have access to relevant information about their conditions, medications, all in one place on the Internet. Patients no longer have to sift through a stack of pamphlets just to get the information they need.
Engaged patients have better health outcomes, are more satisfied with their care, and are more likely to return to the organization in the future. Educational content hosted on patient portals can make it easier for patients to take a more active role ...
Your CRM, if set up correctly, can act as a single source of truth about your organization. It can include information about patient outreach campaigns and their conversion rates. Your CRM can also be a place where all patient information is securely stored and accessed.
What’s even nicer is that administrative staff, who used to spend a great deal of time copying medical records and updating the audit trail, can now simply direct the patient to their portal so that they can get the information electronically.
Now, patients can take a much more active role in their care by having nearly instant access to their own medical records. In the past, a patient had to get medical records by showing up to the doctor’s office and asking them for a copy. Now, most of the information is digitized. But that’s not all patient portals can do.
They found that it is particularly persuasive when providers encourage patients to use the portal because patients trust providers and value their opinions. One provider says he reinforces a patient’s use of the portal by closing all messages with “Thanks for using the portal.”.
One major challenge with the portal is the multiple step registration process . Patients provide their e‐mail address at the front desk and are given a password to register from home. Some patients fail to complete the registration process after leaving the clinic. Remembering and managing passwords and managing family accounts are also challenging for patients. For example, a parent may log in for one child and then ask questions about a second child. For providers and staff, a challenge is that there is no way to know whether a Web‐enabled patient actually uses the portal and there are no read receipts to confirm that patients have read a message.
PHMG launched the patient portal in early 2010. As a first step, the physician champion piloted the portal for about 6 months before it was implemented in one clinic at a time. According to the physician champion, implementation was “easier than expected because everyone was already comfortable with eClinicalWorks, ...
Qualis has also been an important resource for information about the meaningful use rules. "We felt strongly that from a quality standpoint we could not succeed without going to electronic health records. I felt very strongly we had to invest in it because it would positively affect every patient that we encounter.".
In 2007 PHMG implemented an EHR system, eClinicalWorks, as part of a strategy to improve quality of care and facilitate coordination of care across its multiple clinic locations. In preparing for implementation, PHMG proceeded with:
For family practice, messages generally go right to the provider. For specialists, who tend to be out of the office more often, messages go to the nurses or other staff for triage. To facilitate communication, PHMG developed a template for common messages, such as delivery of lab results.
PHMG had a strategy of ensuring that patients hear about the portal from multiple sources during each clinical visit. To execute this strategy, PHMG used several methods of communication, including:
Routine follow-up care for lung cancer patients often involves clinical assessments every 3–6 months. However, these standardised intervals may leave relapsing patients without medical input for weeks between appointments. 1
Routine follow-up care for lung cancer patients commonly involves clinical assessments and imaging at standard intervals, often every 3–6 months. These non-personalised intervals may leave relapsing patients without medical input for weeks between appointments. 1 In addition, repeated imaging is costly and may increase patients’ anxiety.
Researchers in France developed a web-based algorithm to detect potential lung cancer relapses based on patient reports. 1 2 Lung cancer patients were asked to rate their symptoms (e.g. fatigue, pain or changes in weight) using a short online form every week.
The phase III randomised clinical trial of Moovcare ® was stopped early due to significant differences in median overall survival – 19 months in patients using Moovcare ® versus 12 months in patients receiving standard care. 4