8 hours ago · The Government Requires Patient Information. The government and legal system usually respect patients' privacy and don't require doctors to disclose personal medical information. However, there are a few basic data points doctors must report. Doctors must file birth and death certificates. They must also report certain diseases they've treated ... >> Go To The Portal
As a result, a treatment facility, for example, cannot share any information about your treatment, such as its outcome or if you are still under treatment, unless you give that facility consent to share that information. Explore your Higher Education options at Nurse.com/Schools.
Full Answer
Because it does not provide for a general patient right to informed consent or a nursing home residents right to informed consent the federal bill would likely provide stronger protections for residents in this state. 83Source: Rules of the Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation.
Despite the warning, nursing homes still often administer antipsychotic drugs in this manner, sometimes without seeking informed consent first, in violation of federal regulations and human rights norms .
Rather, the board is asking the RN directly about her psychiatric history. She, then, is the one who would disclose this information, so no breach of confidentiality under any law would be taking place.
Since a doctor can’t put someone in a nursing home, that ends up leaving the decision to you and your family. While it may be the only option depending upon your circumstances, hopefully these suggestions will help the process go more smoothly.
Health care providers may disclose the necessary protected health information to anyone who is in a position to prevent or lessen the threatened harm, including family, friends, caregivers, and law enforcement, without a patient's permission.
Answer: No. The HIPAA Privacy Rule permits a health care provider to disclose protected health information about an individual, without the individual's authorization, to another health care provider for that provider's treatment of the individual.
Answer: Yes. The HIPAA Privacy Rule at 45 CFR 164.510(b) specifically permits covered entities to share information that is directly relevant to the involvement of a spouse, family members, friends, or other persons identified by a patient, in the patient's care or payment for health care.
Yes. The Privacy Rule allows covered health care providers to share protected health information for treatment purposes without patient authorization, as long as they use reasonable safeguards when doing so. These treatment communications may occur orally or in writing, by phone, fax, e-mail, or otherwise.
There are a few scenarios where you can disclose PHI without patient consent: coroner's investigations, court litigation, reporting communicable diseases to a public health department, and reporting gunshot and knife wounds.
Exceptions Under the HIPAA Privacy Rule for Disclosure of PHI Without Patient AuthorizationPreventing a Serious and Imminent Threat. ... Treating the Patient. ... Ensuring Public Health and Safety. ... Notifying Family, Friends, and Others Involved in Care. ... Notifying Media and the Public.
Even if you mean no harm or don't think the patient will ever find out, it still violates the person's privacy. You'll always need to get a client's expressed consent when sharing anything that potentially exposes their protected health information (PHI). Even if you're asking for their testimonial.
What is a HIPAA Violation? The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability, or HIPAA, violations happen when the acquisition, access, use or disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI) is done in a way that results in a significant personal risk of the patient.
Health information such as diagnoses, treatment information, medical test results, and prescription information are considered protected health information under HIPAA, as are national identification numbers and demographic information such as birth dates, gender, ethnicity, and contact and emergency contact ...
You may disclose personal information if it is of overall benefit to patient who lacks the capacity to consent. When making the decision about whether to disclose information about a patient who lacks capacity to consent, you must: make the care of the patient your first concern.
Doctor-patient privilege, also known as physician-patient privilege, refers to a confidential communication between the doctor and the patient that receives protection from disclosure. The common law does not recognize doctor-patient privilege, but the privilege exists in all jurisdictions through statutory language.
Right of access, right to request amendment of PHI, right to accounting of disclosures, right to request restrictions of PHI, right to request confidential communications, and right to complain of Privacy Rule violations.
Research on subjects who have a psychiatric illness raises serious ethical and legal concerns. Before proceeding with research, informed consent from the subject or proxy must be obtained. Psychiatrists have a special duty to ensure that patients with mental illness are capable of providing free and informed consent to psychiatric research, and that those who are incapable are not exploited as research subjects. The ethical principle of justice applies: incapable subjects should be neither deprived of the potential benefits of research nor required to bear a disproportionate burden of research.
It is important that psychiatrists have an awareness of the ethical underpinnings of consent and the legislated requirements related to consent, including precedent cases. Consent may change over time and for different conditions and circumstances. Consent must be an ongoing process.
Consent is a complex concept, especially in the medical context. The dictionary definition of consent is “to give permission for something to happen; to agree to do something.”3, p 368The etymology of the word consent (from the Latin word consentire, taken from con= together; sentire= feel)3, p 368describes the intention of consent. There should be a harmony of feeling, or joining of sentiment, between the parties when the permission is granted—in other words, a mutual agreement.
Psychiatrists must respect the autonomous decisions of capable patients, including the right to accept or reject any medical care recommended. This means that psychiatrists must appropriately assess issues of autonomy and capacity, taking into consideration any external constraints or psychopathology that may impact these issues.
Psychiatrists should ascertain, where possible, and respect, the treatment wishes of an incapable patient as they were expressed before the patient became incapable (for example, through an advance directive, living will or proxy designation). When informed consent by the patient is not possible, and prior treatment wishes are not clearly known, an appropriate substitute decision maker should be sought to represent the patient’s treatment wishes or best interests.
From an ethical standpoint, informed consent is a process of communication, whereby a patient is enabled to make informed and voluntary decisions about accepting or declining medical care. Concurrently, there are important legal procedural aspects to informed consent that should not be overlooked. Psychiatrists must recognize that a signed consent document does not ensure that the process of informed consent has taken place in a meaningful way or that the ethical requirements have been met. Psychiatrists should be prepared to engage in consent to treatment discussions on an ongoing basis, and appropriately document the contents of these conversations as part of the permanent medical record.
As such, consent to treatment encompasses permission for all modalities of the assessment processes, diagnostic investigations, and procedures and (or) ongoing monitoring for same , as well as physical, medical or psychotherapeutic interventions. Consent and the mature minor, and consent to research related to psychiatric practice are discussed briefly, but are not the main focus of this paper.
It is assumed the policy includes the following: Patients are admitted upon an order of a healthcare provider who has admitting privileges (e.g., licensed physician, licensed advanced practice nurse, licensed oral surgeon), and who also provides the hospital staff with a diagnosis and any standing or other orders for the nursing staff to follow.
Nurse’s Inaction Leads to Wrongful Death Lawsuit for Hospital
It is assumed the policy includes the following: Patients are admitted upon an order of a healthcare provider who has admitting privileges (e.g., licensed physician, licensed advanced practice nurse, licensed oral surgeon), and who also provides the hospital staff with a diagnosis and any standing or other orders for the nursing staff to follow. The policy most probably also requires the nursing staff to notify the admitting healthcare provider when the patient is admitted.
If you have not reviewed your institution’s policy and procedure on admissions, you should do so. Other resources would be your nurse manager or CNO, or the admitting office. Be sure to get clarification on any concerns about the admission process so you can comply with its requirements.
Sometimes; here’s an example….a new admission does not have depression listed as a Dx…but has fluoxetine 100mg PO BID for depression in the signed meds list…in that scenario, it’s usually ok to add depression as a Dx because the doc signed off on the Dx on the orders sheet.
An RN submitted a question about needing to apply for a license in another state because, as a case manager, her employer requires all RNs to have licenses in the states in which they provide case management.
As you know, the obligation of any state board of nursing is to protect the public by ensuring that those who are licensed are competent and safe practitioners. As a result, they have the authority to ask applicants, and those who renew their licenses, a great deal of information, including if the applicant has any criminal convictions and has had psychiatric care.
Because integrity and honesty are essential qualities of a nurse, it is vital that your application for licensure be truthful and complete. Providing all requested information is critical so that your situation can be evaluated with the attention it needs, and the right decision about licensure can be made.
However, the confidentiality we enjoy under these laws is not absolute. For example, if you are thinking of harming another person and you share that information with your therapist, the therapist is required to take steps to ensure, insofar as possible, that the harm does not happen. These steps could include discussing your comments with your psychiatrist, evaluating whether you intend to act on your feelings and, if necessary, notifying law enforcement and/or the person you thought to harm.
As a result, a treatment facility, for example, cannot share any information about your treatment, such as its outcome or if you are still under treatment, unless you give that facility consent to share that information.
First and foremost, it is important to point out that, generally, a person’s psychiatric history is confidential. States and the federal government assure this with legislative statutes, such as mental health confidentiality laws and through HIPAA provisions. As a result, a treatment facility, for example, cannot share any information about your ...
Call and ask them for a list of assisted living communities that are authorized to provide behavioral health services. Go online and search for the term “behavioral health assisted living” and call the first few facilities shown in the results. This is a great way to find assisted living communities that specifically advertise these types of service offerings.
Most state guidelines give assisted living communities broad use of residency termination when safety is the concern. When the community decides it is not suited to manage the behaviors, it isn’t uncommon for the initial reaction to be termination of residency. The main reason residents face eviction is due to the community’s inability ...
If your loved one is facing eviction from an assisted living community, here’s what you need to do: Keep an Open Mind – Safety First. Although residency termination can be a spontaneous reaction, it is important to be open minded and listen to the challenges the community is facing. After all, the highest priority is your loved one and their safety.
It is very difficult when something just doesn’t seem right with your loved one and when you inquire, because the community is not equipped to respond appropriately, you really don’t get an answer. Often this is due to staff that are not trained properly address behavioral issues and medications are not being monitored properly by a licensed psychiatric clinician.
Primary care doctors typically don’t have a specialty focus in mental health. This presents medication challenges that affects activity of daily living, life quality and can further lead to resident decline. This issue comes down to scope of practice.
A primary care doctor doesn’t have (nor do they want) the responsibility of managing psychiatric medications and issues. This leads to lower care quality. Make sure you get the proper specialized care for a traumatic brain injury, elderly depression, or whatever specific mental health issue is at hand.
Assisted living = residents new HOME. Therefore, if they have a SKILLED NEED, home health care agencies are able to provide care for SN, PT, OT, ST as these are not being paid for under most facility agreements while personal care assistance is paid.
As NRSKaren said, the regulations vary by state, but I believe that ALFs do have to have at least a nurse consultant available, even on a limited basis, if the residents have any nursing needs. And if they don't have nursing needs, they are usually in independent living (IL) rather than AL.
Doctor's orders can be even more of a headache. They MUST be complete and detailed! We cannot assume anything, as we are not trained to do so. A lot of doctors and nurses do not understand this practice and send incomplete orders. Then we have to contact the office once again to get them complete.
In Alabama Assisted Living Facility does not require nurse oversight, but Specialty Care Assisted Living requires an RN for admissions, careplans, monthly assessments and other items, but they do not need to work 40 hour weeks or anything like that. Many just work parttime. Where I was, though, we operated at a higher standard: RN 8 hours per day minimum, LPN to administer meds and monitor unit. CNAs had to be actually certified and be on the state registry.
Laurel Cline, the daughter of an 88-year-old woman in a California nursing home, said she thought the facility used antipsychotic medication to silence people whose symptoms disturbed the staff. Cline said it was obvious that her mother had physiological conditions requiring medical attention.
Nursing homes turn to antipsychotic drugs — among other classes of psychotropic medications — because dementia is associated with agitation, irritability, aggression, delusions, wandering, disinhibition and anxiety.
These powerful drugs are misused for a variety of reasons, including a misperception by nursing home staff that the medications can help people with dementia; a lack of awareness of their dangers, despite the black box warnings; lack of training in dementia care; and, perhaps most significant, to compensate for understaffing.
The use of antipsychotic drugs as chemical restraints — for staff convenience or to “discipline” a resident — has a long history in nursing homes. In 1975, the Senate released a report, “Drugs in Nursing Homes: Misuse, High Costs, and Kickbacks,” documenting some of the same trends we still see, more than 40 years later.
Suarez said she had given her consent to use the drugs because she feared that the staff would not bathe her sister enough if she refused. But when Suarez saw the effect they had, she had second thoughts. She expressed them to the nursing home, but Natividad was taken off the antipsychotics only after she was placed in hospice care. She died a few months after my interview. Her family, seeing her in a reduced state and unable to communicate, wondered whether the drugs had compounded the losses associated with dementia; Suarez thought they contributed to her sister’s decline. “She gets no nourishment,” she told me not long before Natividad died.
While such symptoms are frightening for the people experiencing them and challenging for their caregivers, institutional or otherwise, antipsychotic drugs have not been found to be effective at managing them. In a small number of particularly complex cases, antipsychotic drugs may be appropriate as a last resort.
A social worker in Texas who used to work in a nursing facility said the underlying issue is that “the nursing homes don’t want behaviors. They want docile.”. Many nursing home staff spoke to me about using antipsychotics to control residents as if it were a perfectly acceptable practice.
One such requirement is the resident’s right to be fully informed in language he or she can understand of his or her total health status, including, but not limited to, medical condition.1 The resident also has the right to choose an attending physician, to be fully informed in advance about care and treatment and of any changes in that care or treatment that may affect the resident’s well-being, to participate in planning care and treatment or changes in care and treatment (unless adjudged incompetent) and to refuse treatment (regardless of whether doing so may be detrimental).2
patients are informed and acknowledge in writing, during the course of their residency, of their rights including (as excerpted above) their medical treatment, right to be free of chemical restraints, etc….
If the patient has been adjudicated incapacitated or found to be incompetent to consent to treatment, express and informed consent to treatment shall be sought instead from the patient's guardian or guardian advocate. If the patient is a minor, express and informed consent for admission or treatment shall also be requested from the patient's guardian. Express and informed consent for admission or treatment of a patient less than 18 years of age shall be required from the patient's guardian, unless the minor is seeking outpatient crisis intervention services under s. 394.4784. Express and informed consent for admission or treatment given by a patient who is under 18 years of age shall not be a condition of admission when the patient's guardian gives express and informed consent for the patient's admission pursuant to s. 394.463 or s. 394.467.
The department shall require all skilled nursing facilities and intermediate care facilities to adopt and make public a statement of the rights and responsibilities of the patients who are receiving treatment in such facilities and to treat their patients in accordance with the provisions of said statement. The statement shall ensure each patient the following: (f) The right to be adequately informed of his medical condition and proposed treatment, unless otherwise indicated by his physician, and to participate in the planning of all medical treatment, including the right to refuse medication and treatment, unless otherwise indicated by his physician, and to know the consequences of such actions….
Arkansas’ public health and welfare laws include a section on the rights of long term care facility residents (20-10-1204) which includes provisions similar to current federal requirements that nursing home residents must be informed of treatment plans, be provided opportunities to participate in their development and have the right to refuse treatment.
Second, every states law is evaluated as to whether it is more or less protective than The Improving Dementia Care Treatment in Older Americans Act. This is important because the bill (as introduced in 2012) includes a preemption clause. Section 5(e) of the bill reads, Nothing in this paragraph shall preempt any provision of State or Federal law that provides broader rights with respect to informed consent for residents of facilities. In other words, to any extent that a state law mandates stronger informed consent protections for its nursing home residents, those standards apply. The following sections begin with an overview of The Improving Dementia Care Treatment in Older Adults Act. This is followed by each states informed consent law (or lack thereof), including the law[s title, excerpts of relevant text and a brief summary and analysis of the law. Links to the laws are provided in footnotes. For ease of reference, the table of contents, above, provides internal links to each of the state sections. The appendices provide the text of Section 5 of the 2012 federal bill, the text of the current federal informed consent requirement for participation in experimental research and a chart listing the states and indicating whether or not, based on our findings, they currently provide strong or weak informed consent protections to nursing home residents in their states.
Iowa’s medical malpractice laws include informed consent provisions that are, generally speaking, similar to the standards in the proposed federal bill. Iowa’s law is more protective in one important respect: it requires consent in writing. The proposed federal bill does not specify whether patients must provide consent in writing or orally.
Doctors and nurses are not allowed to put people in nursing homes because they do not have the legal authority to do so.
Their primary concerns focus on the safety and the best opportunity for health and well-being for their patient . It is not at all unusual for a healthcare team to recommend a level of care that either you or your loved one believes exceeds what is necessary.
There are several compassionate and respectful steps you can take to encourage someone to consider a nursing home.
If your loved one has concerns prior to going into a nursing home, it is important to address them. It is also equally important to address them even after they arrive there. While nursing homes are increasing in numbers and availability, many institutions have been dogged by reports of poor care and inadequate infection control.
If you aren’t having success encouraging a loved one to move to a nursing home, consider asking another family member for support. Another family member can broach the subject and explain the reasoning, which might help that person see things more clearly.
Examples of nursing care include wound care, IV medications, catheter care, respiratory therapy, and regular injections, to name a few. Some patients may need two people to transfer them.
Perhaps your family member is worried about being isolated if visitors aren’t allowed. Make sure to set up video conferencing prior to admission to a nursing home and instruct your loved one on how to use it. Your loved one will be glad to see and talk to a friendly face, instead of simply hearing your voice.